Menu

OBJECTIVE

HOLISTIC AND NATURAL HEALTH


Web Journal Wednesday 5th March 2008
  • Father jailed for murdering son. A father loses it over the loss of his wife and murder's his four-year-old son and stabs his 14-year-old daughter 13 times. She survived.
  • UK children rescued from sex ring. The police rescue these eight children who had been sexually abused inside their own homes and paraded on the Internet where there photographs were used as a form of currency.
  • Whistleblower raises child safety fears. Child minders and private nurseries are not up to standards to ensure that children are safe and cared for well. Inspectors are told not to look closely as exposed tonight on BBC One's The Whistleblower at 8:00pm.
  • Son link in fatal park stabbing. It appears that this father had intervened on behalf of his son some months earlier and was set upon yesterday by a group who killed him after receiving a distress call from his son that he was being bullied.
  • Stab victim's police call probed. The father of five who was killed defending his son from bullies noted in the above article called the police before his death. The police have called in the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) to investigate.
  • 21 July bomb plotters seek appeal. The "dud" bombers, some of whom are local to this area, started a two-day appeal today against their sentence from an earlier trial.

1. Father jailed for murdering son. Was he jealous of his son blaming him for losing his wife and took it out on his daughter at the same time he went into a violent rage? This father's life was crumbling. It could not have occurred in an instant and must have been building for a long time. There had to be signs and warnings that people should have recognised to prevent this murder and serious injury. Why wasn't this detected and reported?

BBC News Wednesday, 5 March 2008, 14:48 GMT

Father jailed for murdering son

Ryan Hawkins
Christopher Hawkins told the court he loved his children

A man who murdered his four-year-old son and tried to kill his teenage daughter has been jailed for life and told he must serve 21 years.

Christopher Hawkins, 47, of Royd Street, Slaithwaite, Huddersfield, stabbed son Ryan to death last September, Leeds Crown Court heard.

He was also convicted of attempting to murder his daughter Donna, 14.

Hawkins attacked the children as a form of revenge after his marriage broke down and his wife started an affair.

After the attack, Hawkins, who was covered in blood, had a pint in a pub and said he had stabbed his children.

Father jailed for murdering son

2. UK children rescued from sex ring. The police are doing a brilliant job here by tracking down from photographs on the Internet featuring abused children those children in their own homes. As is described in the article below: these children were not missing. They were not snatched from the road. They were apparently subject to systematic abuse inside the home with the photographs of the abuse then traded on the Internet as a kind of currency. Why aren't these people detected and exposed by the local community? Surely, someone must have known what was happening. The children must have talked to someone. Are people in the local community afraid of what might happen to them is they report their suspicions?

If the police do such a brilliant job here, why is it that they've botched this situation completely for almost a decade supporting and sustaining the child abusers to carry on with their child abuse and violence against an adult (me) who reported the abuse in early May 1998? If the police are spending so much time, energy and resources developing these leads and saving these children, why are they not stopping the violent child abusing adults from destroying the community with their open use of surveillance technology carried out with complete police participation and support?

BBC News Wednesday, 5 March 2008, 13:29 GMT

UK children rescued from sex ring

Computer
So far 22 people have been arrested including two UK men

Eight children from the UK have been rescued from a world-wide group of sexual predators, child protection experts have said.

The children were identified from thousands of images seized in an international operation involving the FBI and Queensland police in Australia.

The victims were traced to addresses in the UK, the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (Ceop) said.

So far 22 people - including two men from the UK - have been arrested.

. . .

Paul Griffiths who heads the victim identification team at Ceop, said the children were subjected to horrendous abuse.

"In every image there is a child. These images are crime scene photos where children are being subjected to sexual abuse. This is not child pornography."

He said: "It's important to remember too though that these children were not missing.

"They were located in the place where they were supposed to be safe - their own home - where their abuse was recorded and made available over the internet to satisfy sickening sexual desires of a deviant group of individuals."

UK children rescued from sex ring

3. Whistleblower raises child safety fears. Tonight on BBC One's The Whistleblower programme at 8:00pm those who inspect nurseries expose the truth about the quality of these inspections and the risks which children might be incurring. It's government targets and image management that are driving the need to create a false public facade where risk exists under the surface growing due to the superficial inspections that are no inspections at all.

This is consistent with tenant management's rating by the Audit Commission in 2003 and 2006 in the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea. As a result the children here are at risk too because the child abusers were given surveillance technology in mid-August 1998 to protect themselves and prevent the reporting of the child abuse. This image management created a false sense of security while another generation of children grew up to antisocial standards and neglect. My complaints about this have met with a "wall of silence" even from the Audit Commission.

BBC News Wednesday, 5 March 2008, 02:33 GMT

Whistleblower raises child safety fears

By Imogen Willcocks
Reporter, Whistleblower

Imogen Willcocks
Imogen Willcocks had no previous experience of child-minding

Every day, over a million working parents use childminders and private nurseries, believing their babies are in hands of highly qualified, strictly regulated and genuine caring people.

Terrifyingly, many of them are wrong.

Last year an inspector at Ofsted - the government agency that regulates childminders and nurseries - phoned the BBC Whistleblower programme and told me a chilling story.

Out of 700 nurseries she and colleagues had inspected, she had found only five that she would have let her own two children go to.

She told me that Ofsted inspection reports - the only thing parents have to go on when choosing a nursery - aren't worth the paper they're printed on.

At times I was on my own with as many as 13 children
Imogen Willcocks

"We are literally skimming the surface", my Ofsted whistleblower said. "We are told constantly: 'if you don't see a problem, don't look for one. Take a quick look and get out'.

"The number one priority for all Ofsted inspectors is to meet their targets. Because if they don't they are disciplined. Targets take priority over safeguarding children," she said.

I decided to test her claims by going undercover and getting myself a job in a number of nurseries.

Whistleblower raises child safety fears

4. Son link in fatal park stabbing. Once again a father trying to protect his son from bullies is killed by them. If the government allows the bully child abusers to use surveillance technology in the community to carry out violence against anyone who might even think about reporting it, then bullies everywhere will feel free to act as they please.

This has resulted in a murder, but what about all those others which result in grievous bodily harm? Is anything done about them? They do not capture the headlines like a murder. It appears that these bullies carry out this activity with impunity thinking that they will only injure someone to "teach them a lesson" and maintain their control over the neighbourhood. They probably succeed at this activity.

This time, however, a father of five was murdered. How many such attacks actually occur? How many violent abusers are allowed to use surveillance technology complete with police protection and participation to carry out continuous non-stop violence against anyone who would dare report this abuse. How many crimes are counted from continuous violence 24/7? How many people are allowed to use the surveillance against one person such as myself? What does this do to the community, and what impact does it have on the young as they develop?

BBC News Wednesday, 5 March 2008, 15:48 GMT

Son link in fatal park stabbing

Thompson Park, scene of stabbing
Mr Shafiq was hit on the head with an iron bar and stabbed

Police are investigating whether the fatal stabbing of a man in a park in Lancashire was related to an alleged attack on his son five months ago.

Mohammed Raja Shafiq, 50, was hit on the head and stabbed as he tried to stop trouble at Thompson Park in Burnley on Tuesday.

About 10 people were involved but up to 50 others watched, police said.

A lake is being drained in a search for the weapon. Five men are being held in connection with the incident.

Lancashire police said the attack was not racially motivated.

Mr Shafiq, from York Street, Nelson, was described as a "family man". He died a few hours after the attack in the Royal Blackburn Hospital.

. . .

"His son had phoned his father and said there was a gang of youths bullying him so his father rang the police and then made his own way over there as well."

Det Supt Mick Gradwell, leading the inquiry, told the BBC that Mr Shafiq's family had been left devastated by his death.

"There are a lot of witnesses who have seen what's happened to Mr Shafiq," he said.

"Anybody who is aware of what happened before, during or after, I really want to hear from, and urge them to come forward."

Son link in fatal park stabbing

5. Stab victim's police call probed. The police have called in the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) to investigate the way this call from the murder victim was handled.

Recently the IPCC was criticised by the Police Action Lawyers Group (PALG) who represents those filing complaints against the police. Their main complaint is that those who are overseeing the IPPC investigations are not senior nor experienced enough. The IPCC rejects this and claims that the PALG's complaint centres around cases that were from the Police Complaints Authority its predecessor organisation. The PALG has withdrawn from its advisory role at present.

BBC News Wednesday, 5 March 2008, 20:46 GMT

Stab victim's police call probed

Mohammed Raja Shafiq
Mr Shafiq called the police before trying to stop the fight

A father-of-five made a desperate phone call to police just moments before he was stabbed in a Lancashire park.

Mohammed Raja Shafiq was trying to stop a fight in Thompson Park, Burnley, on Tuesday when he was stabbed and hit with an iron bar. He died hours later.

Police admit they are "concerned about how Mr Shafiq was dealt with" and have referred the matter to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC).

Four males, aged 20, 19, 19 and 16, are being held on suspicion of murder.

A 17-year-old is also being questioned on suspicion of violent disorder.

Stab victim's police call probed

6. 21 July bomb plotters seek appeal. Here's the result of allowing the community to carry out terror with the use of surveillance technology. The real terrorists are created as described recently once again. Here they are making a defense that they did not intend to bomb anyone. Their bombs were intended to frighten, attract attention and carry a message to the community about Iraq. Do you belief that? I don't.

There is an absolute and total disregard for my human rights. Just for starters I have been deprived of the following human rights for many years as established by the Human Rights Act of 1998:

RIGHT TO LIFE: 1. Everyone's right to life shall be protected by law. No one shall be deprived of his life intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a court following his conviction of a crime for which this penalty is provided by law.

PROHIBITION OF TORTURE: No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

RIGHT TO LIBERTY AND SECURITY: 1. Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law.

RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL: 1. In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law.

NO PUNISHMENT WITHOUT LAW: 1. No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or international law at the time when it was committed.

RIGHT TO RESPECT FOR PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE: 1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

FREEDOM OF THOUGHT, CONSCIENCE AND RELIGION: 1. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion.

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION: 1. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression.

PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION: The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground.

PROHIBITION OF ABUSE OF RIGHTS: Nothing in this Convention may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the Convention.

The government has been carrying out this kind of terrorism against me depriving me of my human rights for almost a decade with the use of surveillance technology only it has perpetuated a massive hoax to justify such extreme abuse with the surveillance technology. The terror campaign has involved hundreds of people from the local community who all participate and peek in at me at one time or another. They seek to attract attention by making extreme and false allegations of many kinds that constitute continuous torture treatment. They seek to carry a message to me and to the community: that of fear, hatred and destruction.

It is the government by its tenant management, police, NHS, social services and local and central government departments and agencies who seek to terrorise the community into submission by fear from a created "enemy" scapegoat. Those in power seek to control and dominate the community on a perpetual terror basis by using the child abusers and vicious violent people to carry out terror against one person thus instilling fear and intimidation in others.

The problem is that this terrorism activity by the government inspires the real would-be terrorist to actually carry out terrorist acts as these "dud" bombers did on 21.7.2005. Some of them lived not far away in the Colville Terrace area on the east side of Portobello Road. They constructed their bombs not far away in the northwest direction. And, one of them tried to blow up his bomb but failed (thank goodness) at the nearby Shepherd's Bush Hammersmith & City Line Tube station just south of the BBC.

The government started this terrorism in this neighbourhood in mid-August 1998 almost ten years ago and has been running it 24/7 ever since involving hundreds of local people all of whom have spread the word about what has been happening and continues to happen right here at the Lancaster West Estate. The result has been a cadre of terrorists who tried to blow up Tube trains and a bus in a manner identical to those who succeeded two weeks earlier on 7.7.2005. Where do you think they leaned their defense after the bombs failed to go off?

When will the government learn that it has created terrorists by its own behaviour for almost a decade and stop this terrorism so that they can then reduce the possibility of terrorist attacks and redirect resources against the real threats to the community? These are the people who take the law into their own hands with the use of surveillance technology and set the example of destruction justified by emotional claptrap. It's logical that others will do the same on a larger and different scale by a means within their capability. When will the government actually get smart to stop its behaviour and incitement of terrorists before the terrorists attack again emulating the ways of the government?

BBC News Wednesday, 5 March 2008, 13:16 GMT

21 July bomb plotters seek appeal

Muktar Ibrahim, Yassin Omar, Ramzi Mohammed and Hussain Osman  (clockwise from top left)
The four men were found guilty of conspiracy to murder

Four men found guilty of planning the failed 21 July bombings in London are seeking permission to appeal against their convictions.

Muktar Said Ibrahim, Yassin Omar, Ramzi Mohammed and Hussain Osman will give evidence via video link from prison.

They are serving sentences of at least 40 years each for conspiracy to murder.

The men tried to detonate explosives on three Tube trains and a bus, two weeks after 52 people were killed in similar attacks. But the bombs did not go off.

The case, which is expected to last two days, is being heard by Sir Igor Judge, Mr Justice Forbes and Mr Justice Mackay at the Court of Appeal's criminal division.

. . .

Mr Carter-Stephenson said the four men had maintained the 21 July events were "an elaborate hoax designed to protest against and draw attention to Britain's role in the attack upon and occupation of Iraq".

He said Ibrahim argued the explosive devices, which were carried in rucksacks, had been made to look realistic, but had flaws deliberately built into them "to ensure that the main charge of each of those devices would not detonate".

On 21 July 2005, the four men tried to detonate rucksacks carrying explosives on three London Underground trains at Shepherd's Bush, Oval and Warren Street station - as well as a bus in Hackney Road. None of the devices exploded.

It came two weeks after the 7 July bombings on three Tube trains and a bus which killed 52 people and injured more than 770. The four bombers were also killed.

21 July bomb plotters seek appeal

Go Back

Post a Comment