- MP's anger over baby death report. MP for Kettering where Jessica Randall died calls for accountability for her death to be assigned to those in charge after report claims the process was the source of the problem without any individual responsibility.
- A joined up pattern of abuse. An adult can be made defenceless with surveillance technology in the same manner a child is defenceless against adults.
- 9/11 case pilot can claim damages. Justice cranks away solely, but apparently in this case it has provided a foundation for this pilot to address his wrongful imprisonment that started ten days after 9/11 and went on for months in Belmarsh high security prison.
- Wrongly jailed pilot wins review. Two years ago this Algerian pilot was still struggling for justice and was given leave for a judicial review the results of which were announced today (see above).
- 'No crime' in extremist reading. The Appeal Court quashes "thought crime" conviction freeing five imprisoned for what they read. Ideaology and not "how to" manuals are OK. Feel free to read the Koran.
- Men guilty of parking row death. Death by abuse. In this case a brick through the window intended to harass resulted in death. However, the figurative bricks thrown at me second-by-second around the clock are intended to kill. That's attempted murder (so far) and is nothing like the manslaughter which occurred here. It was a corrupt police officer who made this manslaughter possible.
- 'Happy slap' death girl convicted. I've long maintained that "Happy Slappy" filming of attacks on people had their origin from the government taking photographs of me continuously from at least December 1999 onwards. Many people have participated and many have taken photographs including children. The Crown Prosecution Service has successfully prosecuted a 15-year-old for filming a death.
1. MP's anger over baby death report. This MP has got it absolutely right, and those in charge should be held responsible. They are paid substantially and given the status of their mangerial roles. For this they are responsible for what those working under them are doing. When something goes wrong as drastically as it did in this instance, those in charge and most especially whoever is on top of this hierarchy should be held accountable. Processes do not fail. People do as especially occurred in this instance.
BBC News Thursday, 14 February 2008, 08:40 GMT
MP's anger over baby death report
 Andrew Randall was jailed for life in March 2007 |
Health bosses should take responsibility for the murder of a baby by her father, an MP has said.
Jessica Randall was killed when she was 54 days old in 2005 by her father Andrew, who also sexually abused her. He was jailed for life in March 2007.
A report into the death, in Kettering, Northamptonshire, concluded care workers, who visited Jessica 30 times, had failed to identify her as at risk.
Philip Hollobone, MP for Kettering, complained of "lack of accountability".
Northamptonshire Teaching Primary Care Trust confirmed Jessica died after 30 members of staff at Kettering General Hospital and the trust had failed to begin child protection procedures.
. . .
The report said it was the process through which children were reported as being at risk that had failed. This was despite finding that a doctor at Kettering General Hospital suspected Jessica was being abused but never recorded the concerns in medical notes.
Mr Hollobone said: "I think the public will be amazed that the report has concluded that no individual was responsible, but if that is the case then those in charge of the processes, those in charge of the organisations, need to step up and take responsibility.
MP's anger over baby death report
2. A joined up pattern of abuse. Suppression by means of surveillance technology to cover up deliberate disregard has become the standard in this country in conjunction with "whitewash" reports which blame processes and not people. Here are my comments of support sent to the Kettering's MP whose constituent was Jessica Randall as described above.
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: "MP's anger over baby death report" BBC News Report at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/northamptonshire/7244204.stm
Date: Thursday 14 February 2008 13:27
From: Gary D Chance
To: hollobonep@parliament.uk
The Hon Philip Hollobone, MP
Kettering
Dear Mr Hollobone
You are absolutely right to claim that management should be held accountable in the death of Jessica Randall.
The situation is still far worse than anyone imagines even after the Victoria Climbie inquiry, and the result of this report on the death of Jessica Randall.
I reported child abuse in May 1998. Three months later after I reported further child abuse with an infant being hit which I heard and did not see, surveillance technology was installed against me that was placed at the disposal of those whom I had reported for child abuse.
The child abuse went on simultaneous with the abuse against me carried out by means of the surveillance technology. It's those in charge who created this situation and have literally destroyed this community after nine and one-half years of continuous 24/7 surveillance technology suppression.
Given the facts of my situation I doubt whether there will ever be anything done meaningful about the problem of child abuse given the power of those in charge to ignore and abuse when it suits their purpose to cover up their own failures or what I have come to call as deliberate disregard.
An adult can be made defenceless with surveillance technology in the same manner a child is defenceless against adults. While Jessica's marks on her body were described as her own injuries and accepted, the same occurs when I report want is happening to me. It is the same fundamental pattern of abuse.
They overlooked Jessica Randall's fractured skull and broken ribs in the same manner that the cataracts which developed from the abuse of surveillance technology have been discredited and ignored in my situation.
There's not much hope for this country when it is dominated and controlled by those with abusively violent personalities, and MPs themselves are subjected to secret surveillance monitoring when meeting with their constituents.
Believe it or not this is a joined up pattern of abuse that has become the standard of this government with Parliament and MPs marginalised.
Yours sincerely
Gary D Chance
3. 9/11 case pilot can claim damages. The Home Office danced to the tune of the US by holding this "suspect" in Belmarsh pending extradiction to the US. The US showed up with no evidence which is typical of what one can expect from the US government. The judge released him from prison after some five months when there was no evidence. He has been seeking compensation for this abuse against him for almost six years.
The UK continues to dance to the tune the US plays and obtained a law passed by Parliament an imbalanced extradiction treaty with the US which would have allowed him to be sent to the US and possible execution on this false charge simply based upon suspicion. Fortunately for him this extradiction law arrived later, but he could have languished in some place like Guantanamo for years while the US government/military tried to make a case. If there was none and no evidence, they could concoct it or just keep him imprisoned as are about 250 who remain at Guantanamo.
At the same time as I've directly experienced, the UK has allowed agents of the US government, US Marines (former?) to hold me captive in North Kensington for the past seven years since February 2001 (seven months before 9/11) by means of surveillance technology from which there is no escape.
This allows the US government and its military personnel (active duty/retired) to carry out indefinite imprisonment, torture interrogation, medical experimentation and surveillance technology R&D for as long as it wants without working legitimately through the legal justice system as occurred with this pilot who was wrongfully imprisoned as finally determined.
It was Jack Straw followed by David Blunkett in May 2001 who were the Home Secretaries at the beginning of my torture abuse and false imprisonment which commenced in mid-August 1998 as a result of my originally reporting the child abuse which then resulted in the child abusers given access to then operational control over the suveillance technology used against me.
Colonel Vine and Lt Harry Bird arrived in February 2001 as I was commencing my legal proceedings in the High Court with their most sophisticated of all surveillance technologies which have been in use against me 24/7 now for seven years. David Blunkett sustained this when he became Home Secretary and was present at the time this pilot was falsely imprisoned shortly after 9/11.
When I raise the issue of my false imprisonment, it can just be denied while blaming me for being mentally ill which is always used to discredit the truth in such situations. A whole host of false allegations are made against me from terrorism and major crimes to insignificant nonsense which are used to inflame others into letting the surveillance monitoring to continue.
There is no intention to enter the legitimate law enforcement and legal justice system arenas. Instead, the abuse is maintained in the hopes of destroying my life completely so that I cannot reveal all that has happend. Lt Harry Bird stated recently "He should be dead by now." That's his objective.
This is the future for many people who are disliked for one reason or another such as dissent or disagreement with policies. People can be imprisoned, tortured and executed in this manner completely outside the democratic rule of law while those who carry it out can get away with it. The UK and US governments stubbed their toes on Lotfi Raissi. They will not let it happen again.
They will just detain someone by the use of surveillance technology indefinitely at the whim and pleasure of those agents who consider themselves above the law. There will be many people such as myself destroy in this way in the future. There will be no redress of grievance for anyone treated in this manner as has occurred with Lotfi Raissi.
BBC News Thursday, 14 February 2008, 13:03 GMT
9/11 case pilot can claim damages
 |  Lotfi Raissi says his life was destroyed by the accusations  |
Lotfi Raissi reaction A pilot wrongly accused of training the 9/11 hijackers is entitled to claim damages, the Court of Appeal has ruled.
Judges said evidence suggested police and prosecutors were responsible for "serious defaults" in detaining Lotfi Raissi in jail for nearly five months.
The ruling means the government has to reconsider the 33-year-old's claim for compensation, which it had refused.
Mr Raissi wants an apology and says his claim may run into millions of pounds. The government has said it may appeal.
9/11 case pilot can claim damages
4. Wrongly jailed pilot wins review. /Two years ago this falsely imprisoned pilot held for extradiction by the US who turned up without any evidence despite representations to the contrary was granted leave to apply for a judicial review seeking compensation which he had been denied by the Home Secretary. The results of this review are noted above, and a link to this article is provided for background information.
BBC News Friday, 17 February 2006, 18:30 GMT
Wrongly jailed pilot wins review
 Lotfi Raissi (centre) says his life was destroyed by the accusations |
An Algerian pilot mistakenly accused of training the 11 September hijackers has won the right to challenge a decision not to compensate him.
Lotfi Raissi was never charged with any terrorism offence but spent five months in Belmarsh high security prison.
Although a judge later said there was no evidence linking Mr Raissi to terrorism, the Home Office said he was not entitled to compensation.
But a High Court judge awarded him the right to a judicial review.
Wrongly jailed pilot wins review
5. 'No crime' in extremist reading. Shortly after 9/11 I was quoting what a Muslim cleric said on BBC Radio 4's Today programme about murder that was taken from the Koran. Lt Harry Bird carefully monitoring all my activity second-by-second starting yelling "He's quoting from the Koran" as if that constituted an act confirming terrorism. He refpresent the extreme whacko, right wing personality who hates everything most of all himself. He acts everything no matter what it is simply to be attacking.
His behaviour reflects that of this Labour government who has made every effort to enact laws to detain people without charge and imprison indefinitely for those under suspicion. They have actually management to carry this out for the last nine and one-half years against me with the use of surveillance technology placed at the disposal of those whom I reported for their crimes and later joined by US government agents and US Marines (former?) Colonel Vine and Lt Harry Bird.
Where this behaviour is brought before the courts, it has been eventually overturned and quite rightly so. My efforts to seek protection from the High Court in March 2001 was destroyed by the use of this surveillance technology which Colonel Vine and Lt Harry Bird had just introduced in February 2001 to track and monitor me wherever I was located while verbally abusing and subjecting me to surreptitious medication intended to debilitate and incapacitate. Thus, the problem of legal oversight was circumvented and the legal justice system rendered moot.
Lt Harry Bird and others with him make every effort to stop me from documenting, writing and reporting what has been happening for this past decade and before. They seek to quite literally control thought and expression by their continuous attacks around the clock. For more information about this decision described in the article whose link is provided below please see a Q&A exposition provided by BBC News and the actual decision by the Court of Appeal.
BBC News Thursday, 14 February 2008, 09:37 GMT
'No crime' in extremist reading
 Clockwise from top left: Raja, Iqbal, Zafar, Butt and Malik |
Nobody should be jailed for reading extremist literature, the government's terror laws watchdog has said.
Lord Carlile said there must be "a real intention" to plan or commit an act of terrorism for a prosecution to proceed.
And it was "absolutely right" nobody was imprisoned "for mere thoughts, mere fantasies, mere wishes - even for their reading matter", the Lib Dem peer said.
On Wednesday the Appeal Court quashed convictions of five young Muslim men jailed over extremist literature.
The Lord Chief Justice said there was no proof of any intention to plan terrorist acts by the five - Irfan Raja, Awaab Iqbal, Aitzaz Zafar, Usman Malik and Akbar Butt.
They had been convicted last year by a jury at the Old Bailey, which heard the men became obsessed with jihadi websites and literature.
'No crime' in extremist reading
6. Men guilty of parking row death. Think about having a figurative brick thrown through your window continuously by someone using surveillance technology who completely invades your privacy inside your home to attack every single little thing that you do no matter where you are or what you are doing, and you'll get an idea of what this experience has been for me for the past nine and one-half years 24/7. The often stated intention of Lt Harry Bird, BS and others is to kill.
Lt Harry Bird has explicitly stated "You will die first" before he stops. So far he, BS and others manage to argue continuously as to why they should be allowed to carry on with this stalking and harassment surveillance technology torture activity which is intended to kill. That's attempted murder at present and has nothing to do with manslaughter as described in this revenge and retaliation attack that resulted in the death of a 79-year-old man. Those who allow this to continue are accessories to attempted murder as are those who participate in this stalking and harassment.
It's also useful to note that a corrupt police officer obtained the address of the 79-year-old man for those who were intent upon harassment. The same type of corrupt police officer (a number of them) have participated in this extensive criminal activity against me thus insuring that it goes on without anyone stopping it.
BBC News
Men guilty of parking row death
Two brothers have been found guilty of manslaughter after a row over a parking space spiralled into a revenge attack.
Bernard Gilbert, 79, died minutes after a brick was thrown into his home in Spondon, Derby, on 28 January 2007, Nottingham Crown Court was told.
Mark Forbes, 40, of Kedleston Close, Ripley, and his younger brother Steven, 22, of Gladstone Street, South Normanton, had denied manslaughter.
. . .
The court heard how Mark Forbes then plotted a revenge attack and traced Mr Gilbert's address through a then-serving police officer.
The officer, Stephen Smith, has since resigned and was fined £1,200 under the Data Protection Act.
Mrs Forbes was also charged with manslaughter but the charge was dismissed due to a lack of evidence on Monday. She admitted conspiracy to damage property.
The court heard Mr Gilbert had health problems including diabetes and high blood pressure and had a limited life expectancy.
Men guilty of parking row death
7. 'Happy slap' death girl convicted. "If you do this, you can be prosecuted for it," said a Crown Prosecution Service representative on BBC News24 while explaining that this was a ground breaking prosecution of someone who participated by means of photographing this abuse which resulted in the death of a 29-year-old man.
I've been subjected to intense abuse 24/7 by hundreds of people over the past nine and one-half years. These have often included children at every step of the way. It comes from the fact that child abusers are driving this surveillance technology abuse against me, and they have permitted the abused children to participate in the abuse against me. Perhaps they were trying to teach the children that abuse is the standard, and those who reported it were then subjected to official abuse by those in authority supporting the child abusing adults. Children have been all too eager to participate.
The first I knew about photography being carried out occurred in December 1999 when the strange cracking sounds I heard around my flat from time to time usually associated with plastic like that on monitors was described as the result of ultra sound photography by those using it. There have been continuous references to photographs made by numerous people throughout all these years. One particular time that was quite prominent was the afternoon of the last Friday in March 2001 when a large number of people out front took turns taking photographs and commenting about how they were turning out each time one was made.
Children have been an integral part of using the surveillance technology against me along with the stalking and harassment torture which they have been key in carrying out. Photography is just a part of this. In fact, it got so bad early on that I started calling this the North Kensington Killing Fields where an official government snuff film was being produced. That is, they were filming the process of death by means of torture from abuse carried out with the use of surveillance technology.
This was so prevalent preceding the advent of mobile phone cameras that when the "Happy Slappy" activity became generally known after these phones were available, I started noting that this activity started here by the government who gave the idea to the kids who then carried on with it when the mobile phone cameras became available. Now, it seems that young people, a girl here as young as 15, are being prosecuted for filming "Happy Slappy" incidents. In this case such physical violence resulted in death.
BBC News Thursday, 14 February 2008, 17:16 GMT
'Happy slap' death girl convicted
A 15-year-old girl has admitted filming the death of a man on her mobile phone in a so-called "happy slapping" attack.
She pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting manslaughter at Leeds Crown Court after filming the attack on Gavin Waterhouse last September.
Mr Waterhouse, 29, from Keighley, later died from a ruptured spleen.
The Crown Prosecution Service said the decision to prosecute the girl was a legal landmark. Mark Masters, 19, and a male, 17, have admitted manslaughter.
All three defendants will be sentenced at a later date.