This day was quite eventful with respect to the ongoing harassment torture from the surveillance technology abuse, my writing an Email about it in conjunction with the anticipated repair to the central heating valve in each flat, the failure to repair in the past and the mysterious simultaneous arrival of a Untilicom person to carry out this central heating valve.
It is rather intriquing that his arrival occurred while I was writing the Email below (enclosed in the second Email sent as a result of his arrival), and those using the surveillance technology noted what I was writing and erupted into intense abuse and incitement. After he arrived and departed leaving the note below which I did not see until after I sent the firsst Email, ********* said "thank you" to someone. It appeared as if this visit was carried out at the beck and call of those carrying out the harassment using the surveillance technology.
I use the balcony repair issue as a backdrop for this overall situation. Demanding continuous inspections involving access to the flat constitutes harassment when no repair is carried out despite promises to do so. This is a pattern of harassment established in the summer of 1998 eight years ago. Instead of carrying out the promised repairs by outside access as agreed, surveillance technololgy was installed with access provided to tenants, residents and others who started carryin out 24/7 unlawful and criminal harassment commencing in mid-August 1998.
A month later in mid-September 1998 I received still another written demand for an inspection of the balcony. This created an overall pattern of harassment from tenant management and the tenants, residents and others. The failure to repair the balcony for eight years simultaneous with the 24/7 harassment using the surveillance technology constitutes a continuous and overall pattern of unlawful and criminal harassment along with a multitude of other crimes.
This pattern has repeated itself once again with regard to the balcony and central heating repair. Instead of repairing the balcony six weeks ago, another inspection was "required" and carried out. No repair has been accomplished since them despite a promise to do so based upon the inspection. This constitutes harassment in the context of the overall pattern of such harasssment which has existed for over eight years. Further inspections were demanded in September 1998 claiming that inside flat access was required due to insurance reasons.
Six weeks ago a ladder was used to carry out that inspection from the outside, and no claim was made about any insurance problems. It has always been quite obvious to me that reasons are manufactuerd to suit whatever purpose is desired at any given time. The balcony state of disrepair was created by outside access within 24 to 48 hours of my stating that this was acceptable for repair which was understood to be necessary although repair appointments had been made with two week lead times in two prior instances c May 1998.
A state of disrepair was created instead over eight years ago which was followed by further demands for inspections which I granted by inside access after one failure to show up. At that time repair by outside means was agreed. This is once again the same set of circular activity which has been repeated during the past six weeks. No repair has been intended since no repair has been effected although an immediate inspection was carried out.
Now the central heating repair falls into that same pattern of harassment activity only this is far more serious since it is life threatening as I have already shown. I addressed this three years ago as an emergency issue which needed to be repaired in 24 hours (it constituted an immediate threat to life) by sending letters to the TMO Chief Executive and the Leader of the Council. Three years later here is the same life threatening problem still unrepaired while I am subjected to continuing 24/7 unlawful and criminal harassment torture involving the the same people who initiated this activity in mid-August 1998.
********* is the mother of the abused children whose chld abuse I brought to the attention of the Council's Chief Executive in early May 1998. She is still using the surveillance technlogy 24/7 to carry out the most intense hate crime involving revenge and retaliation for my having reported the child abuse carried out against her children. She has never done anything else in over eight years reflecting her totally obsessive, viciously violent and quite disturbed personality. The worst aspect of this is that she has knowingly been allowed to act out her extreme emotional disturbance by those whose profession requires that they know and identify such disorders in a most destructive way while these professionals have failed to prevent this ind of abuse from taking place. This is why I have called this Institutionalised Ritual Abuse.
Those using the surveillance technology have exploited the failures to repair for their own unlawful and criminal objectives as I note below. They have been allowed to continue to do this for almost eight yeas with the use of surveillance technology that has involved scores if not hundreds of people. They have interferred with Estate works projects bending them to their own ends thereby using taxpayer's money for unlawful and criminal purposes as well as using business enterprises for unlawful and criminal purposes.
Questions thus arise with regard to the ongoing surveillance technology abuse for unlawful and criminal objectives in conjunction with the honest efforts by Utilicom to get a job done against the background of deceit and manipulation carried out tenant management and many people involved in the abuse of the surveillance technology which I have documented extensivly as a pattern of activity during all these years.
Is Utilicom being manipulated by those using the surveillance technology as a means to gain access to the premises? This is an oft stated demand from those using the surveillance technology by constant references to obtaining an inspection.
Why has the originally published schedule of repairs not been followed? People make summer plans in advance based upon such scheduling. By jumping around like this, that creates more time consuming and expensive work.
Why wasn't the boiler changed for all the positive reasons I've already discussed rather than trying to go through this incredible time consuming and expensive process of changing the central heating valves in each of some 900 flats?
Why has this three month job been scheduled throughout the long, hot summer period when it could have been done in the autumn or spring previously?
Is tenant management using this as an excuse to gain access to every flat in the Estate?
Why is this being done at the same time intensive surveillance technology abuse is being carried out aganst me 24/7 involving the same people who started it all in the summer of 1998 eight years ago?
Why do they find it necessary to offer a prize draw for those who participate in allowing their central heating valves to be changed? This "carrot" is even noted on the little note I received today from Utilicom asking for an appointment (see below). This trivialises an emergency health and safety repair.
Why does Utilicom also include a threat of hot water problems if they are not allowed access to change the central heating valves? This "stick" is incomprehensible. The hot water and heating are two separate systems although they both have heated water from the same boiler. Potable hot water cannot be mixed with recirculating central heating water.
The central heat cannot be turned off because the valves in affected flats do not work when the water flow is reversed to either turn off or turn on the central heating. This has nothing to do with the hot water. Naturally, those whose valves are still functioning might find that they are on the "wrong side" of the water flow reversal after all is done and have no central heating in the winter. In my case I have central heating all the time. In any case, hot water has nothing to do with central heating.
Why does tenant management feel the need to "coerce" by means of a carrot and stick to get people to cooperate?
Why does tenant management feel the need to crush and punish a human being (me) with the extreme lethal abuse of surveillance technology for crimminal purposes to obtain compliance by means of what is in effect unlawful and criminal harassment as has been carried out against me for eight years 24/7?
Read on: there's more to come on this one.
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Re: Balcony Repair; Central Heating; Surveillance & Security
Date: Saturday 15 July 2006 13:24
From: "Gary D Chance"
To: "Damian Donnelly"
Cc: "Alan Hunter", "Tim Harding", "Andrew Coughlan"
Damian Donnelly
Area Manager TMO/EMB
Lancaster West Estate
Grenfell Tower
Dear Mr Donnelly
Please note Item 2 below with regard to the central heating. A Utilicom note was put through my mail flap this morning while I was writing the Email enclosed below which I finished and sent before going into the hall to see what had been put through my mail flap. I did not respond initially to whoever was knocking on my door since I was not expecting anyone. This is done for very good security reasons.
I called Utilicom's "Dave" on his mobile phone to schedule this central heating valve repair since it is being done at this time and not later. These people need to get their work done as easily as possible, and I do not want to cause them any problems especially if they are running ahead of schedule. This repair is quite important for all concerned, and something I need to have done.
However, my problems with the overall set of issues remain which will be addressed legally within the context of all that has happened. Further, the use of surveillance technology for unlawful and criminal harassment carried out 24/7 now for almost eight years by relatives of a tenant or former tenant from the flat [nearby] whom I reported for child abuse presents a serious problem requiring me to specify an afternoon appointment since they interfere with my sleep all night long along with[out] any daytime rest.
Every effort has and is being made to prevent proper legal adjudication of these issues by the use of the surveillance technology as a weapon in the hands of those who are carrying out extensive unlawful and criminal activity including this perversion of the course of justice.
I sincerely hope that this central heating valve replacement will take place with minimal disruption, and I will clear everything away for them to get the work done as easily as possible. Access will be permitted to replace this valve in the hall water tank closet near the front door and nothing else. I hope it solves the central heating problem for my flat.
The daughter of the tenant or former tenant in the flat [nearby], *********, is already making verbal noises about this access and activity due to her use of the surveillance technology tracking all that I do minute-by-minute which has been done extensively this morning as usual. I can hear what is said as a result of their abuse of this unique surveillance technology for unlawful and criminal harassment purposes 24/7.
She, Lt Harry Bird and others exploit everything that happens for their own criminal harassment objectives carried out against me and seek to interfere in works being performed on the Estate toward those ends. This has been well noted during the Estate roof repair which remains as a matter to be adjudicated in the courts.
I will use this as a test to see if this repair is carried out as described and intended for health and safety reasons without any further problems or interference in my life which *********, Lt Harry Bird and others using the surveillance technology try to create as much as they can.
You will have to remember that this central heating problem has been present for many years, and *********, Lt Harry Bird and others have done nothing about it since it supplemented their own and other's objectives with regard to their unlawful and criminal harassment.
They are not interested in maintaining standards but in making antisocial and criminal behaviour the standard in this environment at the expense of people like me who report these serious problems to the authorities so that they can be dealt with properly. This central heating problem is an example of this which I began addressing explicitly three years ago. It's obvious that a double standard is being sustained with the abuse of surveillance technology directed only against me for doing what should and needs to be done. The problems have not been addressed by those using the surveillance technology.
For this reason Utilicom will only be allowed minimal access to swap this valve and that's it.
Yours sincerely
Gary D Chance
cc Alan Hunter, Lancaster West Estate Officer
Tim Harding, Inspector, Metropolitan Police
Andrew Coughlan, Constable, Metropolitan Police
enclosure
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Balcony Repair; Central Heating; Surveillance & Security
Date: Saturday 15 July 2006 11:42
From: "Gary D Chance"
To: "Damian Donnelly"
Cc: "Alan Hunter"
Damian Donnelly
Area Manager TMO/EMB
Lancaster West Estate
Grenfell Tower
Dear Mr Donnelly
1. The balcony has not been repaired in nearly six weeks since my Email of 5th June 2006 on the eighth anniversary of its disrepair.
An inspection was carried out forthwith, yet the repair has not been [accorded] this same alacrity despite its disrepair for over eight years now.
This once again reinforces the suspicion that an inspection was all that was intended without any intention to repair despite unfettered outside access.
2. The repairs to the heating valve control in the flats for Hurstway Walk are scheduled for 26 July to 11 August.
This is at a time when the summer and its heat waves are almost over. I will not allow access for such a control valve change at this time due to my overall legal claims against tenant management in all its forms and the Council.
I have very serious questions as to why a new boiler was not installed for many positive reasons. The decision made to replace these valves throughout the Estate during this summer after I brought this problem to the attention of the TMO Chief Executive and Leader of the Council three years ago in several letters is suspect, and I will want to bring this into legal adjudication along with other problems.
3. The ongoing intensive criminal abuse from those using the surveillance technology and the standard of antisocial and criminal behaviour which results therefrom in this environment make it imperative that I do not allow any disruption to my time until this is brought to a halt and can be properly and legally addressed as was started in March 2001 for this 24/7 haraassment activity which began eight years ago.
4. On Friday morning someone appeared at my door with a delivery once again claiming to be the postman and requiring a signature.
When I opened the door, it was not the postman, and he did not require a signature although he did hand me the three small packages I was expecting.
This is a mystery to me as to why someone would make these misrepresentations. If it was not the postman, then he should have used the front door intercom system. He said a signature was required to get me to open the door, then did not need a signature.
There were very noisy works going on which led me to conclude that the front door was open to permit access as I've described in the past.
It is most important to maintain security in this environment.
5. All of the above plus other ongoing problems leave me no choice but to bring all of this under the protection of the courts for proper legal adjudication including the personal injuries and damages which have accrued during the past decade once the surveillance abuse is brought to a halt.
I have no confidence that repairs will be made that will be satisfactory and could result in more serious problems. The balcony's deliberate disrepair and the failure to repair it are examples of this. Access for inspection is a topic which has been repeated frequently by those carrying out the surveillance in conjunction with their continuous and ongoing fabrications and verbal abuse.
Given this overall situation I have no alternative but to make the decisions as described to insure the integrity of the property and the preservation of my life which is under constant threat by those using the surveillance technology.
*****End of the Email*****