After requesting the contact details for the Kensington & Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation Board Members on Monday as noted in that day's web journal, I received an Email reply stating that the legality of such disclosure was being investigated, and it would be a couple weeks delay. That information is public information available online from Companies House at a a small charge. In response I sent the following Email yesterday once again stressing the seriousness of this situation. This morning I obtained the names and contact details and sent each of the 22 TMO Board Members a letter which has been posed. I noted that one of the Director's address is in Sussex, and three were Councillors in this borough. For a London Council Tenant Management Organisation it seems strange for someone to be located in Sussex. This raises questions. The TMO Board Membes used to be elected by electoral college. This process of electing people who then elected the Board Members ensured that those selected were suitable. No one could rise directly from a Council property to be elected directly to the Board. That has now been changed. I still wonder about the composition of this Board, where everyone comes from and why this information was being withheld from me when it was public information that was readily available. I have published below after the Email reply the letter sent to each of these Board Members today by post along with the publicly available name and address of each Board Member. "Wrong," said Lt Harry Bird as I wrote this while he was watching what I was doing and reading this web journal entry in preparation with the surveillance technology attacking it immediately as goes on minute-by-minute 24/7. ---------- Forwarded Message ----------Subject: Re: Surveillance at your property [Contact Info Request Delay]Date: Tuesday 11 April 2006 20:44From: Gary D ChanceTo: "Emilia Wollheim" Cc: "Councillor John Cox" , "Damian Donnelly" , "Gordon Perry" , "Inspector ********* *********" , "Merrick Cockell" Dear Ms WollheimI see that what I wrote has not sunk in. My response to your Email below is noted in the last three paragraphs or so of this Email. But first I want to comment further on this extraordinary situation which directly threatens my life.I do not have any privacy or confidentiality. The Email you sent to me was disclosed to the general public by the fact of the surveillance technology used continuously by members of the general public as described while I read and answered your Email. This is an offence under the Data Protection Act. You were alerted to this fact in advance by the Email which I sent to the Councillors in the RBK&C to which you were replying. Evidently this was forwarded to you for action. The Councillors' information is public information.I am being subjected to continuous aggravated assault with a deadly weapon with the intent to do grievous bodily harm, cripple, incapacitate and end my life. Threats against my life are numerous by those carring out the surveillance. The daughter of the tenant in an adjacent flat has stated explicitly "I'll get a bomb and blow him out of there." This was witnessed by someone with her when it occurred in 2001.A month or two later I repeated this death threat in my writing which was met immediately with a denial by the daughter of the tenant in an adjacent flat. This is why she is here 24/7 and has been for all these years in order to attack and cover up her criminal activity. However, on this occasion that same witness was present who explicitly contradicted her stating unequivocally "No, that is exactly what you said. I was present."Later she clearly stated "I want him dead." Death threats from those associated with this adjacent started in July 1998 when Xxxxxxx, the daughter's partner, threatened to kill me by public declaration outside. The tenant from this adjacent flat made a death threat against me in December 1999 from outside again publicly. These were reported to the police. Nonetheless, they continue amid tenant management support for their activity. They have carried out these threats using the surveillance technology as a weapon. Lt Harry Bird has stated "you will die first" before he stops using the surveillance technology.As I explained, the use of the surveillance technology by those who have a grudge against me which was publicly declared on Monday and Wednesday, 11th and 13th of May 1998, out front amid a large group of tenants following the police intervention for the child abuse on 8th May 1998 constitutes breaking and entering continuously into my home to carry out the aggravated assault with the intent to do grievous bodily harm in order to destroy life.I am entitled to every reasonable defence against such behaviour as provided by law to preserve and and protect my life and properly especially that property which contains all the evidence of the extensive unlawful and criminal activity carried out against me since 11th May 1998. I have legal obligations and responsibilities which I must meet including the mitigation of damages, and publishing all that is happening and why is one such way under these circumstances.You cannot claim any confidentiality whatsoever with regard to anything you send to me for the reasons I described. Further, you are acting in a capacity which now puts you squarely into the category of those who are acting as accessories to these unlawful and criminal acts carried out against me. You have done so without full knowledge of all that has occurred since 8th May 1998. You have an obligation and responsibility to fully inform yourself which you have not done. You have not asked me any questions. Instead, you have made statements reflecting your ignorance which is unacceptable under law.There is no time limitation due to the fact that tenant management instituted totally invasive surveillance technology against me in August 1998 which immediately caused a personal injury by its very usage requiring immediate attention by my GP. In addition, it was in the hands of numerous tenants who commenced using it to stalk and harass me by carrying out torture activity the intended end result of which was to destroy human activity and life. Depriving me of such privacy and confidentiality from that time to the present has stopped all normal human activity and privileged communication. This was done by tenant management's own actions.You are responsible for complete knowledge of all that has occurred since 8th May 1998. Ignorance is no excuse in the courts. This applies to all those involved. I have been stating this explicitly since 2001 when the thugs were imported to bring about the false imprisonment, torture interrogation and deliberate destruction of human activity and human life. As of February 2001 when the additional thugs arrived, they joined a 24/7 torture process which had been in effect of 2.5 years already. This was carried out in conjunction with surveillance technology R&D and medical experimentation on a nonconsenting human guinea pig including surreptitious medication unlawfully administered to me outside a hospital environment. This has been carried out for many years.I also want to point out that small children were involved in this criminal usage of the surveillance technology and water sampling activity carried out against me by tenant management and those associated with the adjacent. On one such occasion those involved were identified when the activity was explained to tenant management. On another occasion the same little girl was present when sewage spewed out into the bathroom below mine covering the guy showing off the sewage sampling to the little girl. This occurred when I flushed my toilet. While he was held for removal by an ambulance to a hospital for care, what happened to the little girl who was standing right with him? Was there an effort to hush up the fact of the sewage sampling accident denying her proper medical attention?The presence of a young boy using the radar imaging technology in the flat above me on still a third occasion confirmed the nature of this surveillance technology in its early days and its usage to harass. This child was present during this activity on numerous occasions late at night and has been reported by me as constituting neglect of the welfare of a minor. It continued nonetheless. See my web site for these reports.I was appalled that you had the unmitigated audacity to allow yourself to deny tenant management responsibility and accountability under the circumstances of all that has happened during the past eight years 24/7 which I have fully documented and communicated to the authorities to bring to a halt. I am further appalled that you have chosen to send me this delay notification with regard to my efforts under these extreme circumstances to take every reasonable and legal action to preserve and protect my life and property to say nothing about the health and safety threat to others.I advise you to seriously consider your own legal position and take legal advice under circumstances where you are participating in an unlawful and criminal harassment torture campaign whose objective is to "keep up the pressure" to destroy human life and its activity in housing for which tenant management is accountable and responsible. Delaying a response with regard to public information constitutes such participation.I want to point out that on nights when large groups of people connected with tenant management gathered outside my front window, I would write the same warning on my notebook computer. Many would leave when the legality of their actions was questioned, and legal advice was advised. They were reading what I was writing with TEMPEST. I suggest you familiarise yourself with this surveillance technology. See my web site and web journal.Further, they would also leave when it was obvious that there was a set up being carried out by those in adjacent flats. They would leave stating "set up" quite loudly in public out front. Nothing was done to stop this fabrication activity. Tenant management carried on with those who were willing to carry out unlawful and criminal acts.I also want to point out that those who are carrying out the surveillance technology are continuously inciting others to act on the basis of what is only described as "illegal." This is largely Lt Harry Bird. They want someone else to incur the cost and legal liability of attacking me since they will not bear the legal responsibility for doing so.I would welcome legal action against me. It would give me the opportunity to counterclaim and address the whole problem joining all the defendants to address the whole problem in the High Court for the numerous unlawful acts carried out against me.Do you want all of this to become a matter of the public record?Can you afford the years of legal proceedings which will evolve?I would look forward to discovery and interrogatories throughout extensive pretrial hearings and any appeals which might go as far as the House of Lords and the European Court of Human Rights. That's just for starters. I want to try all of this in open court.Those using the surveillance technology hide behind it trying to bully others into unlawful and criminal acts on their behalf. They try to provoke other people and create a conflict situation while they are the source of the problem. It's part of game playing which is the dishonest manipulation of people to gain a "payoff." This game is called by Dr Eric Berne "Let's You and Him Fight." These people use game playing language continuously.So far no one has been dumb enough to be sucked that deeply into their trap although they never stop trying. Apparently you are being duped into such an untenable and potentially legally catastrophic situation. You are now personally involved. Consider your own legal position carefully and take good legal advice.Meanwhile, I am waiting to get the full information I requested with regard to the TMO, EMB and Lancaster West Residents Association Directors and Board Members. Are you trying to deny me that information? Remember that information is available from Companies House including a full history of all those who have served in such a capacity during my ten years of residency in the Lancaster West Estate. This is public information.Surely, you will want to spare me the time and expense from getting this information from Companies House directly online. A fortnight is not soon enough for contact information that I can get in a day. While they may not want to disclose Email addresses, that is their prerogative, but it is something under these circumstances that I believe any responsible Board Member would have no problem about disclosing.I can obtain the contact information and post letters in a few days. The list of Members is public information. I do not have to wait a fortnight. I am trying to mitigate damages you see. You are not. This is not a routine matter nor is my request made routinely. Don't play games with me. I know better.Remember, I am trying to save my life, and I am not overstating the situation.The best thing you could do would be to stop the surveillance technology abuse. In the meantime, I want to write to all the Directors and Board Members of the organisations involved. Is that too much to ask with respect to public information which would save me time and expense?Yours sincerelyGary D Chancecc Inspector ******** **********, Notting Dale Sector, Notting Hill Police Station Councillor Merrick Cockell, Leader of the Council, RBK&C Councillor John Cox, RBK&C Gordon Perry, Chief Executive, RBK&C TMO Damian Donnelly, TMO/EMB Area Manager, Lancaster West EstateOn Tuesday 11 April 2006 15:15, you wrote:> Mr Chance,>> I need to check on the legalities of disclosing the names and email> addresses. I will get back to you within a fortnight.>> Kind regards,>> Emilia Wollheim> TMO Customer Relations Officer

*****Letter sent today to each of the 22 TMO Board Members*****Dear As a RBK&C TMO Board Member I want to call to your direct attention the fact that surveillance has been carried out against me inside my home for seven years and eight months since August 1998. This technology has been in the hands and under operational control of tenants and members of the general public 24/7 throughout these years to carry out stalking and harassment activity including continuous torture for unlawful and criminal objectives relating to my complaints about antisocial and criminal activity. For greater details of this activity please see my web site and web journal at the URLs above. Ultimately Board Members such as yourself are legally responsible and liable for this extensive unlawful and criminal activity carried out by tenant management. Further, I have attempted to bring this to the attention of the Notting Barns Councillors without a reply from my correspondence. I believe that at least one of the TMO Board Members who is a Notting Barns Ward Councillor reflects a conflict of interest by holding both positions. I ask you to fully inform yourself about this extraordinary unlawful and criminal activity and bring it to a halt forthwith. Please also be advised that I obtained your contact information from public information available online at Companies House. My recent request for Board Member names and contact information was delayed by Ms Emilia Wollheim, TMO Customer Relations Officer, for a fortnight while she sought to “check on the legalities”of disclosing such publicly available information. I concluded that the TMO Board Members might very well be treated like mushrooms or worse. I believe that this might very well apply to the extensive complaints I have been making for years for which you and your fellow Board Members are legally liable. Yours sincerely GDC/s/ Distribution David Roger Bird FCIS 257 Pickhurst Lane West Wickham London BR4 0HJ Michael Beverley 86 Pond House Pond Place London SW3 6QT Aisha Braithwaite 8 Edenham Way London W10 5XA Terence Mark Buxton 57 Ovington Street London SW3 2JA Sylvia May Collet 5 Cecil Court Fawcett Street SW10 9HP Councillor John Edward Machell Cox 13 St Anns Villas London W11 4RT Ian Geoffrey Doolittle Bunch Lane Lodge Bunch Lane Haslemere Surrey GU27 1ET Joseph Allan Erickson 39C Danvers Street London SW3 5AY Alfred Joseph Flemming 3 Talbot House 10 Ladbroke Crescent London W11 1PS Steven Joseph Flood 14 Darfield Way Silchester Estate London W10 6TX Gladys Joan Lamb 19 Cecil Court Fawcett Street London SW10 9HP Councillor David Charles Lindsay 26 Avondale Park Gardens London W11 4PR Shelagh Murphy OBE Garden Flat 127 Holland Road London W14 8AS Muhammed Rashid Nasir 49 Sheffield Terrace London W8 7NB Peter Okali 12 Burton Bank Yeate Street London N1 3EP Susan Lynda Parsons 171 Oxford Gardens London W10 6NE Juliet Rawlings 24 Ann Lane Cremorne Estate London SW10 0BN Steven Redman BA Hons 39 Onslow Gardens Chelsea London SW7 3PY Timothy William Rice 13 Whistler Walk Worlds End Estate London SW10 0EP Niamh Riordain 180 Makepeace Mansions Makepeace Avenue London N6 6ES Kemi Joyce Sulleiman 513B Holloway Road London N19 4BY Councillor Mushtag Lasharie 303 Testerton Walk London 1WG*****Email notification that this contact information was available on the TMO website. It wasn't.*****---------- Forwarded Message ----------Subject: Re: Surveillance at your property [Contact Info Request Delay]Date: Wednesday 12 April 2006 21:05From: Gary D ChanceTo: "Emilia Wollheim" On Wednesday 12 April 2006 17:00, you wrote:> Dear Mr Chance,>> Information about contacting TMO board members is available through our> website; www.kctmo.org.uk>> Regards,>> Emilia Wollheim> TMO Customer Relations OfficerDear Ms WollheimI asked because I could not find this information on your web site. Afteryour Email above, I still do not see this information.Kindly provide me with the full URL for the location of this information.Thank you.Yours sincerelyGary D Chance