Today was Holocaust Memorial Day selected because this was the day when Auschwitz was liberated in 1945. However, the lesson has not been learned since today for me was just another day where I was subjected to imprisonment and torture with the lethal use of surveillance technology which started in August 1998. I am fully supportive of recognising the Holocaust on such a day especially in light of those who would deny the historical fact of the Holocaust for their own demented reasons. It is this kind of right wing extremism, hatred and racism which leads to the justification for the abrogation of the democratic rule of law in favour of tyranny and this activity carried out against me completely outside the law and the democratically established institutions for law enforcement and justice. This is being carried out by those who are sanctioned and supported from within existing governments in the US and UK. Here are a couple articles well worth reading about Holocaust Memorial Day: "Shaping the memory of evil" by Suzanne Fields, Jan 26, 2006http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/suzannefields/2006/01/26/183880.htmlEdinburgh Holocaust Exhibition 26 January 2006 18:31http://scotlandtoday.scottishtv.co.uk/content/default.asp?page=s1_2_2&newsid=10308&newsType=There was a day long discussion today about comments made by London's Metropolitan Police Commissioner concerning the press coverage of crime. A terribly tragic murder of two young girls by their school caretaker, Ian Huntley, brought the issue of press coverage to the fore once again. Ian Huntley has been convicted and imprisoned, but earlier he had actually played some role in the police investigation including a media appearance as was noted today. I note this in the following Email which I sent to BBC News24 with a copy to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner. The Commissioner had made an unfortunate comment about the exceptional media coverage devoted to the Soham murders committed by Ian Huntley for which he apologised "unreservedly." However, he maintained his position that media coverage of crime especially murder reflected "institutional racism. Here are my Emailed comments about this and my direct experience during the past 7.5 years. Subject: I Think That The Met Police Commissioner Has A PointDate: Friday 27 January 2006 12:36From: Gary D Chance To: news24@bbc.co.uk, commissioner@met.police.ukThe media covers attractive people with respect to crimes especially murder. This usually means white women in a greater number than others. Why? Because it generates interest. The media follows stories that will attract large audiences to the exclusion of other stories. The whale coverage on Friday and Saturday last is another example.Minority crime is not reported like that of the majority white population. Exceptions do not make the rule like murder of Damiola Taylor. I believe that this is an inherent bias in the media which the media would like to reject. Why is it that the media and especially the BBC are not reporting the 7.5 years of 24/7 surveillance technology torture carried out against me by those for whom I reported child abuse in May 1998?This is a variation on the theme of letting Ian Huntley participate in the criminal investigation of the crime he committed. Here we have the mother of the abused children and the other adults involved in the child abuse carrying out surveillance technology driven torture against the person who reported this violence against children to the authorities hoping to stop fatal consequences.Here is a prime example of the failure of the media to bring attention to the lethal use of surveillance technology to destroy human activity and attempt to kill the surveillance target. There is no doubt about this objective. In what civilised country is surveillance carried out continuously 24/7 for 7.5 years with that technology in the hands of the general public for the purpose of revenge, retaliation and to pervert the course of justice to cover up the original and ongoing crimes (child abuse) and the crimes connected with using the surveillance technology?What civilised country in this world has allowed as a matter of government policy the public execution of someone with surveillance technology by means of torture carried out for 7.5 years?I submit that the media is as Sir Ian Blair has stated. The media is institutionally racist which can be easily determined by documenting all media coverage of crime against all the crimes committed as recorded by the police.I further submit that there is the element of institutionalised ritual abuse which permeates every organisation including the police, departments of government and the media which is a far more serious problem.There are many people in numerous organisations who have a vested interest including a sadistic pleasure in perpetuating surveillance technology driven torture on an indefinite basis that goes on for years and years.It keeps these people employed, gives them an excuse for not getting anything done, falsely unites the community against a fabricated enemy based upon smear and fear tactics and provides sadistic satisfaction from the pain and suffering inflicted on one person over whom complete control is maintained. Worst of all it keeps the psychic cripple in power by creating the illlusion of doing something as the real criminal problems increase and go unreported by the media.The media has many questions to answer. Sir Ian Blair has just asked a very important one. There are more.Gary D ChanceLondoncc Sir Ian Blair, Commissioner, Metropolitan Police