BBC News Friday, 17 March 2006, 13:26 GMT"Labour was secretly loaned £14m: Labour was secretly loaned £13,950,000 by wealthy individuals ahead of last year's election, it has confirmed. Tony Blair has pledged changes to the system."http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4815552.stm"Economist editor calls for Blair to quit. Tony Blair lost an influential ally today as the Economist withdrew its backing for the prime minister in the wake of this week's setbacks." by Ros Taylor. The Guardian, Friday March 17, 2006 http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1733227,00.html---------- Forwarded Message ----------Subject: Labour Will Disclose Future Loans. Really? How Nice. Got Caught Didn't They?Date: Friday 17 March 2006 09:12From: Gary D ChanceTo: news24@bbc.co.ukWhy won't they disclose all the current commercial loans?Labout must be hiding a slush fund that is off the books and outside the Treasurer's accounting.This is what Maurice Stans in CREEP did for Nixon with the cash sitting in a safe in John Mitchell's office.If Labour doesn't disclose everything about these funds in the past, the only assumption which can be made is that they were used for election dirty tricks and went into pockets to ensure substantial voting.How much of this money has been used to carry out 24/7 surveillance against me for seven years and seven months nonstop since August 1998?Should using the general public to help carry this out be considered a political contribution?What about taxpayer's money used for this kind of surveillance all these years as a means to suppress complaints to maintain political image?Tony Blair and Labour have lost it completely. It's all over. Bye, bye Tony. I wonder what this will do for the Lib Dems in the upcoming local elections? The Tories are a nonstarter. ---------- Forwarded Message ----------Subject: Labour Cannot Reveal Lenders Since the Accounts Will Not AddDate: Friday 17 March 2006 20:21From: Gary D ChanceTo: news24@bbc.co.ukEvidently Labour, i.e. Tony Blair, is refusing release the source of the other 9.5 million in loans beause there would be a discrepancy.By not disclosing the lenders for the 9.5 million there is a big question about the honesty of the disclosure.Suppose they named the lenders, and others started realising that they were left out. All it would take is for one such person to expose the fact that the latest number at 14,950,000 pounds is not accurate of the disclosed lenders.It is my belief that the Labour Party cannot release the source of the funds because they have not accurately revealed the amount of money.There appears to be much more here for these "off the books" financial transactions.Where did the money go? Assurances from Tony Blair are useless. He's lost credibility.