Last night there were two films screened on TV based on books by John Grisham: "A Time to Kill" (BBC Three) and "The Pelican Brief" (ITV2). These films contained a great deal of truth relevant to surveillance, assassination and the character of those so engaged. We all watched these films together since everything I do is shared with these people carrying out the surveillance no matter what it is or where I am located. This gives rise to interesting commentary by me about what is happening and gives rise to some abuse from them about me. "A Time to Kill" was notable for the presence of the KKK tying to take the law into its own hands by destroying people if they could not intimidate them. The similarity is that the KKK members are right wing extremist committed to violence. The difference is that the white sheets and hoods have been replaced by surveillance technology used continuously 24/7 as a weapon to intimidate and destroy. That's technological progress. "The Pelican Brief" was filled with assassinations and cover up murders by those in power seeking to get wealthy by the abuse of the power. Anybody trying to expose the truth had better think first because these people play for keeps. The story line is once again highly consistent with reality but reflects the old methods of surveillance and murder. The current surveillance technology and its ability to kill are not being shown to the public yet in these films. I wonder why? What is consistent throughout is the pursuit of greed, glory and power depicted in each of these films that mirrors my experience of the past 7.5 years where the surveillance technology has been used for the same corrupt self interest objectives. It's just a matter of time before this most sophisticated surveillance technology starts appearing in films. It will be challenging for those writing, producing and making the films to be able to have those who seek to publish the truth actually survive at the end. Just how does one counter legally within the democratic rule of law and effectively deal with those who use this surveillance technology? Last week Prince Charles sought a privacy ruling from the High Court involving some of his journal notes regarding a trip to Hong Kong when this colony was returned to China. His comments about the Chinese are indiscrete at best. He complained about politicians flying first class while he was relegated to lower cabin status. And, it seems as though his speech was rained upon. He circulated these private journals to a "selected few." They then appeared in the press. Seems as though he wants to be known as the "dissident" voice in British politics until his opinions are made public that is. He's making a splendid case for an elected head of state. This morning there was a discussion about Prince Charles on BBC News24's Dateline London where a statement was made which fromed the subject of the following Email: ---------- Forwarded Message ----------Subject: Dateline London: Prince Charles Should Have the Same Privacy as the Lowliest CitizenDate: Sunday 26 February 2006 11:34From: Gary D Chance To: news24@bbc.co.ukI have no privacy whatsoever and have not had any for 7.5 years 24/7 365 days a year. I have no privacy of thought thanks to the kind of surveillance technology being used against me.I have no freedom of expression. Everything I document and try to communicate meets with verbal and physical abuse including direct interference with the computer technology now preventing Internet access. Only Email is working, but its typing is subject to interference.Excellent. This means that Prince Charles is subjected to the same.But, we all know that although he is most likely subjected to this kind of surveillance technology, it is not being made public. "Citizen?"Ah, well, there's the difference you see. I'm an Irish citizen so it is OK to destroy my life with totally invasive surveillance technology used as a weapon 24/7 for 7.5 years in the hands of the lowliest citizen.Human rights? Democracy? Justice?What human rights? What democracy? What Justice?Those in power use these words to placate the masses while extensive abuses reflecting the tyrannical character of this country are carried out. All hail Prince Charles.When will he stand up for democracy? The Waxwork Boffins he describes are more applicable to himself. Methinks he was projecting in his journal notes. Poor pathetic Charlie deprived of his yacht, made to fly lower class and drenched by the gods.He needs some on the farm meditation time for self improvement.