I do not believe that anyone understands that the cure proposed here for the failures to process information relating to criminal offenders is worse than the original problem. I do not believe that anyone fully comprehends what it means to get a massive database which can be manipulated in favour of the criminal to hide crimes and criminal activity while creating a personna that is the total opposite. At the same time anyone who should try to report this criminal activity and its coverup will be subjected to massive database manipulation in the opposite direction to villify that person or persons. If you do not think this is plausible, it has been happening to me for years and will be the standard of the future for abuse if this massive central database sharing is allowed to develop. If the controls are not in place to process the data properly in the manner which we've seen in these limited instances of gross incompetence, they will never be in place for a massively large database sharing structure. Instead of solving the problem, the government is creating one that will be a massive failure which no one will ever be able to correct. If you thought the faking of intelligence to invade Iraq was a problem, wait until the intelligence services and the military driven by the power obsessed politicians get into the shared database and "re-create" information for people it does not like and wants to subject to abuse and destruction. It's happening right now, folks.
1. The Home Office has done it again reflecting an incompetence in government administration that is beyond comprehension especially when the Home Secretary John Reid has been there to find all the problems after his predecessor was sacked for this very problem and make certain all these issues are being addressed. This is the same Home Office who permits imprisonment, surveillance technology R&D and medical research to be carried out against an innocent, nonconsenting human being. Then when I bring it to the attention of the Home Office/Secretary, the likes of Simon Watkin writes in response to tell me that I am mentally ill. He has done this twice (2nd March 2005 and 8th August 2006). These letters confirm that this extreme abuse of power is being carried out consciously with malicious intent and has nothing to do with incompetence. The impact of such abuse and its denial from the top of the Home Office not only has database implications of a most serious kind (see below) but suppresses media investigation and reporting by those who are not critically aware of the reality of today's surveillance technology and are all too willing to go along with the government for whatever reason without an investigation into the facts as the Editor of the BBC's Newsnight Peter Barron wrote to me on 6th April 2005 when I brought the first of Simon Watkin's letters to his attention. The pattern and direction of this government's behaviour is all too clear for me. I hope the message is getting out before it is too late despite the government's suppression and denial with the help from those in the media such as Peter Barron.
BBC News Sunday, 14 January 2007, 11:02 GMT
Criminals 'reoffended back in UK'
 Conservatives accused Mr Reid of being "out of touch" |
About 70 of the Britons whose convictions for crimes abroad were left off police records may have reoffended in the UK, the BBC has learned.
There may be others who have new names or have gone abroad again, the National Association of Probation Officers said.
Meanwhile, the Home Office played down reports about career criminal Dale Miller, who carried out a killing after returning to the UK.
It denied he would have been under supervision, had records been updated.
The government has come under repeated fire this week after it emerged that 27,500 files, including 540 for serious crimes, had not been entered on the police national computer.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6260309.stm
2. Here's one overseas offender who returned to kill in the UK without anyone having knowledge about this crime overseas. The information was just not available. In contrast to this, there is a massive about of resources wasted on me, a totally innocent person, to track, imprison, interrogate and punish with the lethal use of surveillance technology during this entire period of time since August 1998. I've written a massive about of documentation and correspondence about this problem to everyone in the government and the media without anything have been done to stop this incredible abuse which goes on as of this writing.
The Observer Sunday, 14th January 2007
Killer missed in fresh Home Office blunder
By Jamie Doward and Gaby Hinsliff
· Officials failed to register criminal· Pressure grows on Reid
 |
 Dale Miller shot a man dead in Newcastle after being released abroad. Photograph: Press Association |
The Home Office was rocked by a new debacle over prisoners last night as it emerged that a British gangster whose convictions for violent offences abroad were not entered on the police national computer committed an execution-style killing on his return to Britain.
The revelation raises serious questions about whether the public would have been better protected if the offences in Switzerland and Germany had been recorded electronically and shared with police. It comes five days after ministers admitted the records of thousands of British criminals who had offended abroad had not been entered into the police database.
The news that, of the 540 most serious offenders identified by police, one has gone on to kill is likely to be followed by further disturbing examples.
Dale Miller, 43, a career criminal and a member of an organised crime gang operating out of Newcastle upon Tyne, was jailed for a series of armed robberies in Switzerland and Germany, only to return to the UK shortly before 2000.
Miller's serious offences abroad should have been put on the police database immediately, allowing him to be monitored by police intelligence units, but, say Home Office sources, his foreign records were instead left buried in files lying around the department.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1990052,00.html
3. This article about cuts in the police due to a cash shortage come after a decade of building the police to get more officer into the forces. Now, like the NHS, apparent cuts are in the works. This is quite disorienting when compared against the prior election campaigns for this government emphasising how many medical professionals, nurses and police officers were being employed. The cynical take on this would be to see it as a means to get more funds by frightening the public into thinking "frontline" crime fighters will be reduced. There is also another way of seeing this: the police are in a massive re-orientation process away from street patrols into a surveillance force. This police forces reduction alert allows this to occur against the background of necessity based upon scarce resources. I believe that this reflects the reality of these fear tactics.
Totally invasive surveillance has been carried out against me 24/7 since August 1998. This has involved the extensive and continuous participation by the police along with tenant management including many local people especially those associated with the flat below for whom I reported their child abuse and other violent activity. There has been a complete usage of the state-of-the-art surveillance technology all along these eight plus years with moves up to more and better (totally invasive) technology taken at times when I've reported this to higher and higher levels of those in authority in the government. Communicating the information from the surveillance technology devices installed has been by microwave transmission. I've seen this with respect to a microwave dish in the front window of the flat below facing down the road where these people sat in vehicles all night.
The wiring to and from the roof outside my windows has been well noted by me and photographed as part of my general documentation of the stalking and harassment activity. I have also suspected that there is a microwave transmission of the surveillance activity to a local police station that is not open to the public. This is located on the other side of the Lancaster West Estate on the corner of Sirdar Road and Mary Place. It has a well fortified parking area and is quite obviously not open to the public. I've always thought that this was a special police enclave of which there are many throughout London. I believe that it is highly likely microwave transmissions from the surveillance technology are being transmitted to this location.
There has been a very peculiar police presence and response throughout these years. Back in September 1997 when I sought to provide the police with some evidence, I could not see the local beat officer at the police station. He wanted to come to my home instead. This was a particularly sensitive time because I had just called the police on an emergency basis the month before (August 1997) for a violent incident in the road outside that involved the partner of BS from the flat below. Although I did not like this idea since those in the flat below sit outside on their balcony and hear everything I say in my living room as BS did when I phoned the police emergency 999 number for this incident, I agreed this one time but never again after the surveillance technology was installed in August 1998. A few months after its installation, I contacted the police about another matter in late 1998 and again the demand was made to stop by my home while refusing to see me at the local police station. I refused due to the surveillance and no meeting took place.
It is my belief that in addition to building up a massive CCTV surveillance system throughout this country the police are also engaged in building a more totally invasive surveillance system picking likely targets of convenience like myself whether justified or not for the development of this technology and personnel. I believe they also see this as a means to replace the "frontline" police on the street with "frontline" police using this surveillance technology initially being used currently on an R&D basis. Thus, this "cash flow scare" might give the police the essential cover to make this personnel realignment.
The name of a young, new beat officer has been often repeated in conjuction with the surveillance technology abuse recently after I had been sending information to the local Inspector indicating to me that the police are currenlty participating in a significant manner. "Inspector" has been used frequently and from time to time "Commander" has been used as it was last night. This is also one of the methods Lt Harry Bird compromises the presence of someone by such revelations of name, rank or position in order to gain power over that person and ensure that they will cooperate with him since he and BS are carrying out extensive criminal activity in which he sees to it that they are implicated. If he is falsely using these names and ranks, then that is just as bad because he is creating the illusion that the police are present for his own corrupt self-interest criminal objectives. That, in some sense, would constitute impersonating the presence of a police officer for the purpose of a crime when police involvement has been well known and extensive.
There is a very tight relationship between the police and tenant management. Too tight in my estimation. With the construction of the 38 business units the police leased one or two of these units on the Lancaster West Estate. This puts them near offices of tenant management which also leased space in this new business unit addition and perhaps close to what I suspect might be a vigilante arm of tenant management, the TRA (Tenant and Residents Association), who is ostensibly concerned with security. The construction of these business units was carried out at the same time as critically important safety and health needs for the thousands of residents were being deliberately disregarded. I have much to say about this overall aspect this problem but will do so at another time.
The Sunday Telegraph Sunday, 14th January 2007
Police cut frontline officers in cash crisis
By Ben Leapman, Home Affairs Correspondent
Police forces across the country are to cut the number of officers because of a government squeeze on funding.
 |
lose some officers' |
Warnings of the impending crisis came as a blow to John Reid, the Home Secretary, who was last night fighting to survive the scandal over his department's failure to record 27,500 overseas convictions.
Mr Reid admitted yesterday that up to 14 British criminals, convicted overseas, later passed criminal records checks because files were not updated. Probation officers said that some of the most serious criminals involved later reoffended in Britain.
As Mr Reid battled to weather the storm, chief constables said that the majority of forces in England and Wales would have to reduce the number of officers and support staff to balance their budgets. This follows a tough financial settlement in which their funding rose only 3.6 per cent.
Tim Brain, the Gloucestershire chief constable and spokesman on funding for the Association of Chief Police Officers, warned: "It is going to hit two-thirds of forces quite hard. Most forces will lose some police officers or police staff numbers. There will be fewer people working in police forces in the future."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/14/nreid14.xml
4. Unable to manage information and databases on a micro level, the government proposes to implement a massive database on the macro level for everyone across all departments of governments with the con that it will improve government services. The only improvement will be the power and political life of those in government. This is all hoopla intended to obfuscate the existing problem by creating an illusionary solution that cannot be accomplished for many years, about which nobody knows anything and which will be wide open to abuse from all sides. This gets the government off the hook for now, it thinks, by pushing the problem way down the line. Also, this is the government who wants an ID card for everyone (60 million) which will be another database and include biometric identification. While this government spends an extraordinary amount of money on these massive database proposals for control purposes, funds dry up for essential government services including the police and NHS.
BBC News Sunday, 14 January 2007, 03:14 GMT
Whitehall plan for huge database
| By Mark Easton Home editor, BBC News |
A giant database of people's personal details could be created at Whitehall under government plans which ministers say will help improve public services.
Tony Blair is expected to unveil the proposal in Downing Street on Monday.
Strict regulations currently prevent one part of government sharing personal information it holds with another.
Ministers argue the data-sharing rules are "overzealous" but the Conservatives say relaxing them would be "an excuse for bureaucrats to snoop".
So-called citizens' panels will gauge public reaction to relaxing privacy procedures so people do not have to repeat personal information to different public bodies - particularly at times of stress such as a family death.
Step by step, the government is logging details of every man, woman and child in 'Big Brother' computers 
Conservatives
Officials think current rules are an obstacle to improving public services.
But such data-sharing is controversial. As well as criticism from the Conservatives, the information commissioner - the data watchdog - has warned Britain may be "sleepwalking into a surveillance society".
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6260153.stm
5. Every time a government failure emerges there is a move to control on a larger scale. Rather than address the problem to solve it, this government takes the control freak route which allows for abuse. In this case it's to establish interlocking databases which will amount to one massive database wide open for abuse. When I document the abuse to which I've been subjected for over eight years now, such information in a shared database would never be corrected. It would be impossible to do so. It's already out there. This means that anyone can fake information and pass it along so that it gets into one database then another and another and so on until its in places no one will ever look. This is then taken as being valid simply because it's in a database. This is straight out of Kafka. The "Big Brother" society is already a reality in the UK as I've directly experienced it for all these years. It is far worse than anything George Orwell imagined. A person can be destroyed by false information and malicious bureaucrats masquerading as professionals who abuse power in the extreme for their own corrupt self interest. It's how they increase their power, image and bank account.
BBC News Sunday, 14 January 2007, 17:48 GMT
Data sharing plans attacked
 Ministers will consult the public before sharing information |
A plan to share people's personal details between government departments on a database would be a threat to privacy, the Conservatives say.
Shadow constitutional affairs secretary Oliver Heald accused the government of "moving one step closer to a 'Big Brother' state".
But the government believes a database would give the public better access to vital services.
Tony Blair is expected to unveil the proposal in Downing Street on Monday.
Work and Pensions Secretary John Hutton said departments already stored "vast amounts of data about individual citizens".
But the information is not shared intelligently across various government agencies, he said.
For example, one family had to contact the government 44 times to confirm various details after a relative died in a road accident, Mr Hutton said.
"We can improve the quality of public services if we are prepared to share data more intelligently."
Ministers intend to consult the public to see if they are in favour of the data-sharing plan.
Five "citizens' panels" of 100 people are being recruited by the polling organisation Ipsos Mori.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6260767.stm
6. Meanwhile, the Pentagon and the US military are digging deeper into domestic US privacy. Wouldn't a central database created by database sharing for everyone make this much easier?
The New York Times Sunday, 14th January 2007
Military Is Expanding Its Intelligence Role in U.S.
By Eric Lichtblau and Mark Mazzetti
James J. Yee, a former Muslim chaplain at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, was suspected in 2003 of aiding terror suspects imprisoned at the facility, but the military's espionage case against him soon collapsed.
Washington, Jan. 13 -- The Pentagon has been using a little-known power to obtain banking and credit records of hundreds of Americans and others suspected of terrorism or espionage inside the United States, part of an aggressive expansion by the military into domestic intelligence gathering.
The C.I.A. has also been issuing what are known as national security letters to gain access to financial records from American companies, though it has done so only rarely, intelligence officials say.
Banks, credit card companies and other financial institutions receiving the letters usually have turned over documents voluntarily, allowing investigators to examine the financial assets and transactions of American military personnel and civilians, officials say.
The F.B.I., the lead agency on domestic counterterrorism and espionage, has issued thousands of national security letters since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, provoking criticism and court challenges from civil liberties advocates who see them as unjustified intrusions into Americans'≥ private lives.
But it was not previously known, even to some senior counterterrorism officials, that the Pentagon and the Central Intelligence Agency have been using their own "noncompulsory" versions of the letters. Congress has rejected several attempts by the two agencies since 2001 for authority to issue mandatory letters, in part because of concerns about the dangers of expanding their role in domestic spying.