1. Without ever having committed an offence and/or be deemed to have cognitive problems and/or mental health illness a person could be subjected to an order which would remove liberty. If a person is judged to be likely to commit a serious offence in the future, s/he could be subject to such an order called a VOO (Violent Offence Order). A violation of this order restricting activity could result in up to five years in prison thus officially criminalising someone who has never been a criminal. Who is to judge cognitive problems or mental illness? If my experience is any indication, those who are violent and have committed crimes have waged a campaign against me with false allegations based upon surveillance technology abuse. This is supported by those whom I have criticised for their gross mismanagement, malfeasance, corruption and image creation. I comes down to the fact that someone who is disliked for reporting the very problems that need to be addressed in this society could be imprisoned for doing so.
I have never done anything especially during the past eight years and five months of 24/7 surveillance technology abuse intended to be provocative. I have reported serious problems which need to be addressed including attempted murder, rape, child abuse and a violent road rage incident. I've continued to report such violence outside and inside including the violence carried out against me. I've been falsely accused of violent behaviour which has never existed by these violent people whom I reported for their violence including a whole programme falsely predicated upon mental health has been implemented surreptitiously by means of surveillance technology abuse. This crime family group associated with the flat below has made every effort to create these problems including false allegations of mental illness to try to discredit the reporting of their own violent behaviour.
After eight years and five months of this continuous 24/7 abuse, I could be subject to such an order, brought into court where the "proof" required is lower than standard and be brought under a VOO. Then those who have faked it for so many years would just continue to fake it claiming a breach which could then lead to imprisonment or being forced out of my home into a hostel. This is why I maintain a comprehensive evidence base in order to protect myself and file a counterclaim if this situation arises. However, as long as the surveillance technology is in place and used as a weapon, it prevents me from addressing this problem in the legal justice system as is my right. Every effort is made to stop me from collecting, organising and reporting the evidence to those in authority. There is a potential for compounding human and civil rights denial here based upon the abuse of surveillance technology in the hands of the very violent people which these orders and the law seeks to restrain in order to protect the public. An abuse of these orders would add a second layer of denied rights.
Such abuse currently puts the public at risk since violence and antisocial behaviour flourish in this area and from these people as I continue to document. If this inversion of society is cemented in place, the increase in antisocial, criminal and serious offences will grow. Just over this past weekend there was excessively loud music late Friday night until after midnight along with blasts of this from time to time. There was excessive stomping on the floor above while I was in the kitchen preparing food on Sunday and the observers were present with those using the surveillance technology. The verbal abuse from child now over eight years older continued as did the nonstop same verbal abuse from the mother and others using the surveillance technology trying to incite others into precipitous criminal action against me by blaming me for what they are doing themselves to effect a setup of which I have hard evidence.
The Sunday Times Sunday, 15th January 2007
Blair wants 'super-Asbos' for violent thugs
By David Cracknell, Political Editor
Tony Blair is to mount a final assault on Britain’s thug culture by introducing restrictions that will curb potential yobs’ movements even before they have committed an offence.
After attempting to tackle antisocial behaviour, he is proposing to introduce a “violent offender order” (Voo) targeted at those whom police believe are likely to commit violence.
These new “super-Asbos” will be aimed not only at people who have a history of violent behaviour or who have just left prison but also those who may not yet have committed an offence.
According to a Home Office document outlining the plan, to be published next month, the measures will ban potential trouble-makers from certain areas or mixing with certain people, alert police when they move house and possibly force them to live in a named hostel, give details of vehicles they own and impose a curfew on them.
The orders will last for at least two years, with no upper limit. Any breach could lead to up to five years in jail. Ministers believe police will apply for 300 to 450 Voos each year.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2546340,00.html
BBC News Monday, 15 January 2007, 01:58 GMT
Violent offender 'Asbos' planned
 John Reid is considering the measures |
The government is planning "behaviour orders" for people considered to be at risk of committing a violent crime.
The orders, similar in principle to Asbos, would put curfews or other restrictions on potential offenders, who might have no criminal convictions.
The orders have already been criticised by civil liberties groups.
Lord Chancellor Lord Falconer says the orders will not be an infringement on individual freedoms because there must be evidence before they are issued.
He told BBC News: "If there's evidence that you could commit a violent offence in the future, proper evidence of that proved in a court, then why shouldn't you be restrained from committing that violent offence.
"We are willing to do it relation to Anti-social Behaviour Orders, why not in relation to other sorts of offences as well."
As with Asbos, the standard of proof needed to issue the orders will be much lower than a criminal conviction requires.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6261791.stm
2. Image management surfaces.
BBC News Monday, 15 January 2007, 08:11 GMT
Labour crime claims 'misleading'
 Police numbers have been increased |
Government claims of successes on law and order since 1997 are "overstated" and "misleading", a study has said.
The Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, at London's King's College, said billions spent on reform had not yielded significant improvements.
Spending on law and order had risen dramatically and proportionately now cost more than in the US, it said.
The Home Office said the analysis was wrong and pointed to record numbers of police officers and prison places.
Richard Garside, who helped to write the report, said the number of convictions had actually fallen since the late 1990s.
 |  This report betrays a history of fiddled figures and doubtful claims  David Davis Shadow home secretary |
"What we have seen is a massive expansion of non-conviction offences brought to justice," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
These included "things like cautions, penalty notices and other administrative means of hitting targets", he said.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6261973.stm
3. These are fascinating news days with the trial of the six 21st July 2005 "Dud" bombers starting today following jury selection last week. This is especially fascinating because these suicide bombers failed to kill themselves and others on 21st July just two weeks after the terrible terrorist attack occurred where 50+ were killed and hundreds were injured. Not only have the police been able to put the pieces together, but one of the bombers chickened out and dumped his rucksack bomb in Wormwood Scrubs north of the BBC and not far away. One of the six on trial lived in North Kensington not very far away in the other direction. Another of the the six failed bomb attempt occurred at Shepherd's Bush Green tube station for the Hammersmith & City Line which was just south of the BBC. He ran up the tracks in that direction and fled to Italy where he was captured and returned for this trial. The police tracked and capture them all. Fascinating information is coming out of the trial and its coverage is well worth reading.
I want to point out once again that all of the activity against me with the surveillance technology is a based upon a complete and total fraud. This removes resources that could have been far better used to track potential terrorists. It was revealed in the prosecution's opening statement today that all six of these bombers spent the night in a flat on Dalgardo Gardens which is again not far north of here off Wormwood Scrubs north of the BBC. It is important to note, too, that I have kept communicating this abuse of power and its total criminal activity 24/7 being carried out against me for many years since August 1998. Yesterday, I repeated the fact that I had received two letters (2nd March 2005 and 8th August 2006) from Simon Watkin in the Home Office. One of these dated 2nd March 2005 was some four months before the two July 2005 terrorist bombings. This was followed by a letter from the Editor of BBC's Newsnight programme Peter Barron dated 6th April 2005 that acknowledged his factual ignorance of what I was describing while concurring with the false coverup conclusion of Simon Watkin based upon the most superficial of assessments.
BBC News Monday, 15 January 2007, 16:05 GMT
Six accused of London bomb plot
 The six are each accused of conspiracy to murder |
Six men planned "murderous suicide bombings" on public transport in London on 21 July 2005, a court has heard.
The prosecution has told Woolwich Crown Court of their alleged "extremist Muslim plot" targeting London two weeks after the 7 July bombings killed 52.
Muktar Ibrahim, Manfo Asiedu, Hussein Osman, Yassin Omar, Ramzi Mohammed and Adel Yahya - all originally from Africa - deny conspiracy to murder.
The six also deny charges of conspiracy to cause explosions.
| THE ACCUSED Muktar Said Ibrahim, 28, from Stoke Newington Ramzi Mohammed, 25, from North Kensington, west London Yassin Omar, 26, from New Southgate, north London Hussain Osman, 28, of no fixed address Manfo Kwaku Asiedu, 33, of no fixed address Adel Yahya, 24, of High Road, Tottenham  |
Prosecutor Nigel Sweeney QC said the men chose a date for their plan "just 14 days after the carnage of July 7".
But the court heard how the conspiracy "had been in existence long before the events of July 7" and did not appear to be some "hastily arranged copycat".
The prosecutor told how six bombs were made using a mix of liquid hydrogen peroxide, chupatti flour, acetone and acid.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6261899.stm
3. I received a second letter from Simon Watkin, "a Home Office official working with the covert investigation policy team and the crime reduction and community safety group," dated 8th August 2006 with the same content as expressed 17 months earlier attacking me personally on the same mental health grounds for the complaints I was reporting to the Home Office about the abuse of power from surveillance technology to which I was being subjected. This indicated to me that the coverup persisted in the Home Office despite the London terrorist bombing and bombing attempt which had occurred in July 2005 over a year earlier. The reason for my correspondence to the Home Office was to notify Charles Clarke about this surveillance technology abuse of power after he took over from David Blunkett. Then after Charles Clarke was replaced by John Reid, I made a point of sending him communication about this surveillance technology abuse to make certain that he was informed. It appeared to me that in each instance with respect to both these Home Secretaries, the bureaucracy was intercepting my letters with Simon Watkin who had "joined the Home Office's Covert Investigation Policy Team in September 2002 from David Blunkett's Private Office where he was a Private Secretary" sending me these personally abusive replies about mental health illness when scores if not hundreds of people know that all I document and report is accurate through their own direct experience with the surveillance technology abuse. Of course, Simon Watkin's letters (2nd March 2005 and 8th August 2006) could be an effort to protect Ministers of State so that they could maintain deniability about this incredible abuse of power.
As it now turns out once again that has developed during the past year while John Reid has been Home Secretary, documentation on some 27,000 people was left collecting dust in the Home Office with no action taken to include the information about those convicted abroad for offences so that these could be included in the police database for the protection of the public. It now has come out this afternoon in a report on BBC News24 that the top civil servant in the Home Office, Sir David Normington, the top civil servant who is carrying out the Home Office investigation, told a Commons committee as reported by BBC News24 that "there is no evidence that Ministers did know." He was reported by BBC News24 to have continued with "on this occasion we [the civil service] have fallen short." In other words this was held back by the civil servants, and the elected officials who are in the top policy and management positions on behalf of the public were kept in the dark. Of course, he might very well be protecting the elected officials especially after Shadow Home Secretary David Davis posed his questions and comments about this matter in the House of Commons during Home Office questions. He implied that the Ministers where enjoying a kind of immunity and not being held accountable for what has happened. He claimed that ministers were hiding the truth. I believe that this is also happening with respect to the surveillance technology abuse which continues against me as of this writing.
It looks like the coverup is well under way, but this eerily appears quite similar to what happened before David Blunkett's departure when an Email turned up to belie his claims resulting in his departure. I note the Prime Minister has not said anything about this one. The Home Office is in far more serious difficulties than anyone imagines. It's no wonder no one can function properly there. This government has tried to politicise the Home Office, and no one knows what to do or how to behave properly since there are no fundamental standards of honesty and decency left in the government itself. With the likes of Simon Watkin working in the Home Office's covert investigation policy team and the crime reduction and community safety group we are all in deep trouble. Exactly the opposite has occurred in this environment for the past eight years and five months from the use of "covert" investigation with surveillance technology with access to and operational control over provided to members of the general public. Crime has increased and security has disappeared. No wonder he wants to silence me with false allegations of mental illness that are being used by those on the ground to hide their crimes and criminal activity.
There are two articles below from BBC News with the same link address. The first report is centred on Shadow Home Secretary David Davis. The second keys on the the comments of Sir David Normington after they were learned and then incorporates a couple comments from David Davis. It is important to get the full reporting about David Davis remarks as well as what was said by Sir David Normington later. These should have been two separate articles with the first left alone. It begins to look like news management on the order of that carried out by Newsnight's editor, Peter Barron, which I described above and yesterday in conjunction with my letters from Simon Watkin.
BBC News Monday, 15 January 2007, 15:54 GMT
Ministers 'hiding' truth - Davis
 There is a backlog of 27,000 cases to be put on computer |
Ministers are "hiding" the truth over the failure to provide police with details of crimes committed by Britons in Europe, the Conservatives have said.
A Home Office official was suspended after it emerged there was a backlog of files on 27,000 cases which should be on the Police National Computer.
Shadow Home Secretary David Davis said it was "nonsense" not to give the public more information immediately.
But the government says an internal investigation will be completed soon.
The unnamed senior civil servant has been suspended after offering information to the inquiry.
'Bogus nonsense'
Mr Davis asked, during Home Office questions in the House of Commons: "Why is it that civil servants get suspended for telling the truth and ministers do not for hiding it?"
He said: "What's gone wrong in this fiasco...who's responsible...and what's going to be done about it?
"Since this may involve ministerial decisions, it's entirely inappropriate for a civil servant to carry out the inquiry.
"It's also bogus nonsense to claim that an internal investigation should preclude the public from knowing what has happened."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6261949.stm
BBC News Monday, 15 January 2007, 17:33 GMT
Home Office boss: We fell short
| There is a backlog of 27,000 cases to be put on computer |
Home Office staff have "fallen short" in failing to give police details of crimes committed by British people abroad, its top civil servant has said.
Sir David Normington told the Commons public accounts committee ministers "didn't get told what was happening".
A Home Office official was suspended after it emerged there was a backlog of files on 27,000 cases which should be on the Police National Computer.
The Tories have accused ministers of "hiding" the truth on the crisis.
Asked by Labour MP Sadiq Khan whether he was happy with the service officials had provided to ministers, Sir David, Home Office permanent secretary, said: "In this case I think we have fallen short."
Suspension 'justified'
Sir David said neither he nor ministers had known about the backlog until last week but said the senior civil servant now suspended from duty appeared to have known.
He added: "The information available to us, we thought, justified a suspension."