". . . O! It is excellent
To have a giant's strength.
but it is tyrannous
To use it like a giant.
. . . but man, proud man,
Drest in a little brief authority,
Most ignorant of what he's most assured,
His glassy essence, like an angry ape,
Plays such fantastic tricks before high heaven
As make the angels weep, who, with our spleens,
Would all themselves laugh mortal."
Isabella in Shakespeare's Measure for Measure II ii
The government itself is responsible for shattering trust and confidence in the community thus becoming a key source of terrorism from within as has been my direct experience for over eight years of 24/7 surveillance technology driven torture.
The way to power is by creating terrorism and perpetuating the fear from terrorism. The real source of terrorism is never addressed. One of the comments from the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair in his BBC News24 broadcast interview yesterday was an appeal for Muslim community cooperation. He has frequently noted in the past as have others that it is important for the community to trust the police. I present the situation where the police themselves have made that impossible by their own actions.
This morning the continuous abuse was underway as usual with my full documentation of all that I do and what is being done to me. I was engaged in discussing trust and confidence that has been lost in this environment by the abuse of power. I've excerpted two separate recordings from the comments I made this morning. They are of an informal nature but quite important in the context of what is happening.
One of those uses as a departure point a frequently heard term from Lt Harry Bird: "He deserves it." This reflects the violent personality justifying the abuse directed at me continuously. He means that I deserve the abuse he is carrying out with the use of the surveillance technology as a lethal weapon.
The other comment is a description of the abuse used by BS against me which is continuous. I imitated her voice sounds as best I could with its screeching alarm t gain attention when she wants to attack. This abuse from BS and my comments about it preceded Lt Harry's statement "He deserves it." This is the order of these two sound wave files. Give them a listen. They are quite informative about the overall context of and impact from this abuse of power:
1. Yesterday BBC News24 broadcast an interview with the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair from Berlin where he addressed the issues reported in the following BBC News article online. However, he suggested in the interview broadcast on air that the time of detention without charge for investigative purposes should be one year. This is not included in the BBC News article below.
He went on to point out in the in the interview broadcast on air that the police would have been hard pressed in dealing with some 48 arrests if they were as complex as the evidence investigation carried out with respect to the recently convicted single terrorist. Other reports have indicated that there was among other concealments plans hidden in a video. Decryption is also a massive problem as well.
While Sir Ian Blair wants police powers to detain terror suspects for up to a year without charge, he is complaining as reported in the article below that the judicial system should speed up the trial process even suggesting that when one trial is completed, its facts/evidence or whatever should be made public even if this prejudices other ongoing trials. How does he expect to get convictions?
BBC News Saturday, 11 November 2006, 22:31 GMT
Terror trials shake-up demanded
 Sir Ian Blair wants a review of the 28-day limit on holding terror suspects |
Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair has called for a shake-up in the way courts deal with terror trials.
He told a summit in Germany that changes to the law were needed to speed up cases and to prevent convictions being held back from the public.
Sir Ian also said the 28-day limit for holding terror suspects needed to be reviewed in the near future.
His comments follow the security service's warning that the terror threat was "serious" and "growing".
On Friday, MI5 chief Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller said the security service knew of 30 terror plots threatening the UK and was keeping 1,600 individuals under surveillance.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6140418.stm
BBC News Sunday, 12 November 2006, 17:07 GMT
Tories warn on terror detentions
 Control orders are part of the anti-terrorism effort |
The 28-day limit on detaining terror suspects before they are charged should be extended only if there is "credible evidence" to do so, the Tories say.
Chancellor Gordon Brown has said he "completely" agrees with police calls for longer detention periods.
But shadow attorney general Dominic Grieve accused ministers of a "knee-jerk" reaction to warnings of an increased terror threat.
It was time for a "rational debate" on the issue, he told the BBC.
Mr Grieve said: "If there is credible evidence that an extension is needed, we will consider that pragmatically."
'Government lies'
But every increase to the time limit "subtly" undermined British principles, he added.
Last year, the Tories, the Liberal Democrats and Labour rebels defeated government plans to extend the period to 90 days - Prime Minister Tony Blair's first Commons loss.
A compromise was eventually agreed to extend it to 28 days, doubling it from the previous 14 days.
Mr Grieve said: "One of the difficulties we have is that we have a government that tells lies.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6141668.stm
2. The Sunday Times reports that the BBC is doing a documentary on the death of Dr David Kelly in the summer of 2003. It intends to investigate issues which surround his death not to pursue conspiracy theories, but to ask questions about the facts, expert testimony and the Hutton Inquiry determination. I wrote about this at the time it occurred with these comments located on my surveillance web site.
The Sunday Times Sunday 12th November 2006
BBC reopens Kelly case with new film
By Maurice Chittenden
THE BBC is risking a new confrontation with Downing Street by launching an investigation into the death of David Kelly, the scientist at the centre of the storm over the “sexed up” dossier on Iraq’s supposed weapons of mass destruction.
It is reopening the case less than three years after its management virtually imploded with the resignations of Greg Dyke, the director general, and Gavyn Davies, its chairman, in the wake of Lord Hutton’s report into the affair.
The corporation is filming a programme about the alleged suspicious circumstances surrounding Kelly’s death in an Oxfordshire wood.
. . .Michael Powers, a barrister, former coroner and an expert on coroner’s law who has been interviewed by the BBC for the programme, said: “It is my opinion that on the evidence before Hutton, a conclusion that Kelly killed himself should not have been reached. This does not mean either that I am a conspiracy theorist. I am not. Or that I believe Kelly was murdered. I do not know. Suicide cannot be presumed. It has to be proved to the criminal standard: beyond reasonable doubt.”
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2450132,00.html