Anecdote Number One
Last night a male exclaimed in the interrogatory "You lied?" To which BS replied with a defiant yell, "It's my job." Criminal activity, i.e., professional perjury, cannot be construed as employment. This occurred while I was going to bed about 1:00 am and was noted immediately on my audio taped notes.
Reprise
Mon Sep 25 21:15:33 BST 2006: "I'm so pleased with myself," said BS. Lying pays. Think of the people she's misled. What are they going to do when they have to face the music?
Anecdote Number Two
This is the obsessive who threatened to hit me "up side of the head" (a milder threat but character revealing) when I ignored her one day while returning to my flat. She came back to the flat below at the same time and saw me unlocking my door which caused her to yell "Are you the one who lives there" as she stepped back into the Walkway. Think in terms of prison design where all the floors are visible from the bottom floor with catwalks going around.
When I ignored her verbal abuse, she threatened violence as if she were speaking to a child. That was her child abuse coming out. I sent a fax to the police about it which she read while I was writing it curtesy of the TEMPEST surveillance technology. She was outside sitting on a bench with others when the police arrived yelling at them as they approached: "What did he say this time?" She was all prepared to refute what had just happened. The police left after a brief discussion to which I was not privileged. This is the future for the use of surveillance technology by the violent bully.
1. The mother of the children [BS] for whom I reported child abuse in 1998 has threatened me with violence and death repeatedly over the years. "I'll get a bomb and blow him out of there," she threatened in 2001. A couple months later while I was writing this in my notes as I am doing now, she immediately denied it using surveillance technology to watch everything that I do 24/7 minute-by-minute. She is obsessively fixated with the use of surveillance technology against me and will do or say anything to maintain is use in order to rewrite history to suit herself including the attempt to destroy her child abuse past and create fear in anyone who would dare tell the truth. A male present then said "No, that's exactly what you said. I was there." Some time later again referring to me she stated "I want him dead."
She has been carrying out this threat to murder for over eight years with the lethal use of surveillance technology. Today I wrote and sent a letter describing this situation to a consultant dermatologist because I had to cancel a clinic appointment for the third time on this Wednesday due to what is going on. It is the identical situation which had occurred over eight years ago in 1998. The pattern of using surveillance technology as a weapon to cause grievous bodily harm continues and has not been stopped despite many who have witnessed this activity and heard the threats along with the medical professionals who have had to deal with the personal injuries. But first here's an article today about a deeply disturbed person who went on to kill after expressing the desire to do so:
BBC News Monday, 25 September 2006, 14:48 GMT 15:48 UK
Stone 'spoke of desire to kill'
 Michael Stone was convicted and jailed for life in 2001 |
The man who bludgeoned Lin and Megan Russell to death in 1996 told a nurse he wanted to kill someone five days before the murders, a report has said.
Michael Stone is currently serving life for the killings and for the attempted murder of Megan's sister Josie in Kent.
Before the murders he received support for mental health problems and drug addiction and spent time on probation.
An inquiry has found failings in his care, but said it was unable to say the deaths could have been avoided.
Days before the killings, Stone told a psychiatric nurse he wanted to kill people, the report said.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/5376036.stm
Gary D Chance
Monday, 25th September 2006
Dr J N Leonard
Consultant Dermatologist
Dermatology Outpatient Clinic
St Mary’s Hospital
Praed Street
London W2 1NY
Dear Dr Leonard
Re Patient Number ************
Due to circumstances beyond my control I am once again forced to cancel my appointment for Wednesday, 27th September 2006 at 1520 in your outpatient clinic. Since this is the third time I have been forced to do so, I will not make another appointment at this time until I can clear up the extremely destructive actions and security threat which now exist. I have a great respect for what you and your clinic have done over the years and appreciate the demands for your and its services as a result in the ever increasing skin cancer problem. I do not want to take up any of your time or that of the clinic under these circumstances. I will call to cancel shortly.
I believe that a brief summary of my overall experience as it relates to the outstanding medical attention and care I’ve received is worth noting in light of the facts which have created this situation. In essence, this is what amounts to adult abuse which parallels child abuse where the violence carried out against an adult results in personal injuries which have to be treated by the NHS. As with child abuse, the source of violence is denied with every effort made to cover it up blaming the victim instead while the victims’ explanations are ignored and disregarded.
In my particular case those for whom I reported child abuse have been able to use surveillance technology as a weapon against me. In each instance there is the key element of defencelessness: a child is defenceless against an adult; an adult is defenceless against surveillance technology. Further in my situation the same character disposition toward violence comes from the same people: what they did to the children they have done to me now for over eight years.
1. On Tuesday, 5th May 1998, I sent a five-page fax to the Council’s Chief Executive about the child abuse in the flat below mine before attending your clinic to see Dr Hardman for a scheduled visit. She scheduled an operating theatre visit four weeks from this date. At the same time I was under care for diplopia at the Western Eye Hospital.
2. On Friday, 8th May 1998, the police intervened in the child abuse problem that had been occurring in the flat below involving four adults, two young children and an infant. My letter to the Council’s Chief Executive went to the nearby Social Services office who interviewed me, and Social Services then called in the police.
3. On Monday and Wednesday, 11th & 13th May 1998, both the mother of the children and her mother, the tenant in the flat below, declared revenge and retaliation against me outside in public amid a large group of people. They had learned quite quickly who had reported the child abuse. Their extensive harassment against me began immediately and escalated when I just ignored them.
A month later:
4. On Tuesday, 2nd June 1998, Dr Hardman performed a couple biopsies one of which was a malignant Bowen’s disease about which I was notified by receipt of a letter on Saturday, 13th June 1998.
5. On Wednesday morning, 3rd June 1998, I was subjected to a burglary attempt while I was present in my flat recovering from the biopsy surgery.
6. On or about Friday, 5th June 1998, a state of disrepair was created on my balcony instead of a repair which was supposed to have been accomplished by outside access which was granted so that I would not be disrupted further during a period of time during biopsy surgery recovering and diplopia care at the Western Eye Hospital. This had been a problem since the end of April involving a slow leak of rain water into the flat below.
The point of the above is to describe the coincident events with respect to my addressing health issues which were of a most serious kind in the middle of a situation where the failure of attention to security in this environment resulted in a threat to everyone. At that time the front door lock had been inoperable for about a month. I had notified tenant management about this when I first noted it in early May 1998, but nothing was done for about six weeks.
I am most security conscious especially with this series of hospital visits and will not let anyone know when I will be out of my home. As can be seen, I was entirely justified in doing so by the burglary attempt. Further, instead of a balcony repair, a deliberate state of disrepair was created. And, behind all of this was the child abuse which I had reported followed by a public declaration of revenge and retaliation which commenced immediately from those four adults in the flat below which soon involved others of like character and disposition.
7. In mid-August 1998 surveillance technology was installed in the flat above about which I was made immediately aware through its use as a weapon to harass me by those who resided in the flats above and below mine including those for whom I had reported the child abuse. It wasn’t long before I was able to determine that radar imaging technology was being used in the flat above to watch all my activity and carry out the harassment.
At the same time my right forearm and hand ballooned from lymph oedema caused by the absence of lymph nodes under my right shoulder due to the melanoma surgery in August 1979. I went to see my GP about this shortly after it started because it was quite serious. This was the first personal injury to occur as a direct result of the surveillance technology used, and it began immediately with its used.
A little over two years later cataracts were diagnosed by the Western Eye Hospital after continuous tracking of the deterioration of both eyes which also began simultaneous with the use of this surveillance technology. This matter and threat from possible blindness was brought to the attention of the Metropolitan Police Commissioner in two separate letters in the autumn of 1998 whose predictions were proven to be correct because the radar imaging technology continued to be used.
What concerned me deeply at the time was the fact that such a device using intense electromagnetic radiation was being used 24/7 only two months after the diagnosis of malignant skin cancer (Bowen’s disease). In addition, it was employed at a time when I was under care by the Western Eye Hospital for diplopia which I was making every effort to stabilise and eliminate if possible. Those using this surveillance technology concentrated on creating chronic sleep deprivation whenever they saw me try to rest or sleep during the day or night and cut my average sleep time to some four or five hours of sleep each night in several segments because they kept waking me.
A year later I learned that such chronic sleep deprivation could have quite serious consequences too as was published in The Lancet in October 1999:
The Lancet, Vol 354, 23rd October 1999, page 1435 entitled Impact of sleep debt on metabolic and endocrine function. This article puts paid to the notion that sleep debt has no adverse effect on health. Sleep is as valuable to the body’s proper functioning as to the brain’s rejuvenation each night. It’s conclusions include: 1) “sleep debt . . . if maintained chronically, could have long-term adverse effects on health [where] “decreased carbohydrate tolerance and increased sympathetic tone are . . . risk factors for . . . 2) insulin resistance; 3) obesity; 4) hypertension; and 5) memory impairment.” (page 1438.)
After over eight years of this activity including cataract surgery which was delayed for two and one-half years until the summer of 2003 in order to try to bring this external risk factor to an end, all of this goes on as of this writing and is the reason that I was forced to cancel my appointment for Wednesday afternoon. There were points of ever escalation of this surveillance technology abuse against me when I continued to report what was happening. In February 2001 it was escalated to something unknown to the general public and the medical profession with the utilisation of neuroscience surveillance technology whose character was even beyond imagination. Nonetheless, I learned in a relative short period all about it because of the people involved which most especially still included those for whom I had reported the child abuse.
They continued to make every effort to do as much harm and damage as possible including the exacerbation of the personal injuries which they created. Because of the cataract diagnosis in December 2000 by the Western Eye Hospital, I sought the legal protection of the High Court in March 2001. This legal processing was scuttled by the use of the newly introduced and far more sophisticated neurological surveillance technology.
I was correct in delaying the cataract surgery out of fear of further abuse. This was proven by the two biopsy surgeries I had as a result of annual visits to your clinic in the summers of 2001 and 2002 if my memory serves me correctly. I was subjected to intense abuse following these surgeries in the hope of interfering with the healing process and causing further injury. I could not delay the cataract surgery further and scheduled it for the summer of 2003 with one eye operation at a time. In this case since local anaesthetic was used, I could and was subjected to verbal abuse while on the operating table. Had I moved as a result, the surgery could have been disastrous. Since I was used to this kind of abuse which was continuous 24/7, it did not have any affect on me.
During the six week recovery period after each eye surgery, I was subjected to continuous abuse from those suing the surveillance technology again in an attempt to destroy the surgery result. Their hope was to make me blind. They did not succeed. Your biopsy surgery was subjected to the same abuse during the recovery period last year. Every effort is made to deprive me of sleep in order to do as much damage as possible and prevent proper healing and recovery. This is why I have to make every effort to take care of myself in the way that I know will be successful, and this is the reason that I will not have any surgery unless it is absolutely necessary. I do not seek an medical attention and intervention unless it is entirely justified and deemed necessary.
I am faced with people who are making every effort to create a problem using the most sophisticated electromagnetic radiation surveillance technology ever known as a weapon of abuse while I am making every effort to address only those problems which are real and threatening. One of those necessary medical attentions under the historical circumstances and consistent with the abuse being carried out against me is an annual visit to your clinic to have a medical professional check thoroughly for any sign of a skin cancer to catch it sooner for prevention rather than later when it could be a catastrophe for me and the NHS.
As a form of punishment and harassment consistent with the use of the surveillance technology, tenant management has failed to repair my balcony for almost eight years and four months. Instead, they have requested numerous inspections. Under these circumstances such repeated requests for inspection also constitute harassment. On Friday last a scaffold was erected for either inspection or repair. I will have to wait to see which. This scaffolding up to my balcony constitutes a security threat in an environment where there is a high security risk which I have experienced directly. In addition I am still subjected to continuous 24/7 abuse from the use of the surveillance technology by the same people who started the harassment in May 1998 and then continued with it using surveillance technology commencing in August 1998.
In fact, the mother of the abused children has never been anywhere else except in my presence 24/7 with surveillance technology for over eight years. This is a totally obsessive and disturbed personality. She has threatened to kill me and stated “I want him dead.” She is carrying this out with the abuse of this surveillance technology 24/7. What you are getting and what those at the Western Eye Hospital and my GP were getting is the physiological impact of this violent abuse from surveillance technology in the hands of the viciously violent and extremely sadistic personalities who are seeking revenge and retaliation for my having reported their child abuse and, as it now stands, their ongoing criminally violent behaviour.
Therefore, because of the security threat from the scaffolding up to my balcony at present and the 24/7 abuse to which I am subjected, I cannot attend your clinic on Wednesday afternoon. I wish that you would recognise this for what it is: an adult who displays physical personal injuries from violent abuse carried out with the use of surveillance technology that has been going on 24/7 for over eight years. The great tragedy is that the medical profession has fallen down in many cases of child abuse, e.g., Victoria Climbié, and not taken proper steps to bring it to a end before death results. The same is happening to me even though I have the ability as an adult to communicate what I carefully and thoroughly document. You have a responsibility to report this as it is and not blame the victim or in this case the patient. The same is true for those at the Western Eye Hospital and at my GP’s surgery.
Instead, I have noted in my files a letter from a doctor in your clinic to my GP noting that I might be suffering from “paranoid schizophrenia” after I described the fact of my surveillance technology abuse to get another annual appointment to catch any damage that this might be doing. Unfortunately, this is an example of blaming the victim. While it does not negate all the good work and medical care which your clinic has provided, it represents an attempt to dismiss a valid report of a serious problem in a medical context where the violence has resulted in personal injury or potential personal injury given a risk from a history of skin cancer.
One of the means by which those who use surveillance technology for abuse try to cover up their abuse is to blame the victim and ascribe my reports to mental illness. This is an all too familiar occurrence in prisons where inmates are tortured and try to report that torture only to be discredited by the torturers as having a mental illness. It is an all too familiar occurrence in my experience of the child abuse which I heard extensively. The mother of the abused children would blame the children for what she did to them. She is blaming me for what she is doing to me with the surveillance technology.
I am trying to address this most serious and life threatening of problems which has forced me to cancel the earlier two appointments with your clinic this past summer, and now I have the added security threat from the scaffolding which allows anyone to climb up to my balcony from the ground. I have no security, privacy or confidentiality whatsoever. All that I do is known by scores if not hundreds of people. Everyone locally has accessed the surveillance technology at some point. The abuse which I describe here has been going on all morning especially while I have been writing this letter. They have the ability to monitor all that I do and attack it as it is done which has been going on throughout this writing process. This is a very large and quite serious issue which carries a need for very grave concern from all in society-at-large.
Yours sincerely
/s/GDC
2. Gordon Brown comments on his dedication to "service" to change people's lives. Is he talking about the above by enabling the antisocial and criminal types to use surveillance technology against those who address domestic violence and child abuse in the proper manner as described in the above letter. Listen to Gordon Brown's full speech from the link below:
BBC News Monday, 25 September 2006, 15:22 GMT 16:22 UK
Brown sets out leadership vision
 |  Mr Brown is the favourite to succeed Tony Blair  |
Brown speech Gordon Brown has made his pitch to the Labour Party conference in Manchester to be Britain's next prime minister.
Mr Brown said he had the experience and right values for the job - and said he would relish the chance to take on David Cameron's Conservatives.
In the test of his political life, Mr Brown paid tribute to Tony Blair but admitted they had differed at times.
"Where differences have distracted from what matters I regret that, as I know Tony does too," said Mr Brown.