- 'Easy targets' for predators. Prostitutes are only one example of a group of people deemed to be an underclass subject to deliberate disregard thereby becoming easy targets from the viciously violent.
- Deliberate disregard for underclass groups. The psychic cripple carries out violence against the vulnerable and seeks to create vulnerability by means of surveillance technology as I've directly experienced for a decade. The use of surveillance technology for 9.5 years has nothing to do with an investigation.
- Child's remains 'found' in Jersey. For four decades child abuse went on at a home for children in Jersey which was closed in the 1980s. Today the remains of a child have been discovered with the search continuing to look for more.
- Little difference between Jersey and North Kensington. If Jersey's institutional child abuse went on for decades without being stopped, the same child abuse also extended to an adult (me) has been carried out for the last decade in North Kensington. It's easy to see how the this violence goes on for decades when the government is the perpetrator.
- Mandatory DNA database rejected. The government has got it upside down on this issue. A DNA database should be developed, and the ID card systen scrapped.
- Let's have a DNA database for all now. A multitude of benefits by protection from identifying criminals and little if any costs. Why isn't this being done when ID cards with all their problems are being rammed through?
1. 'Easy targets' for predators. The vulnerable in society become the targets of the viciously violent in many ways. The latter group seek to hide behind the notion that such people do not merit the attention and protection afforded to those in society who are not in an underclass. They are made easy targets because those in positions of authority like the police turn a blind eye to such violence when used against people who have unfortunately become trapped in an underclass some of the reasons for which can be traced back to society as well.
BBC News Saturday, 23 February 2008, 06:13 GMT
'Easy targets' for predators
| By Chris Summers BBC News |
A man has been convicted of murdering five women in Ipswich. He is the latest in a long line of killers who have targeted prostitutes. Could the police be doing more to protect prostitutes and catch their killers? Marina Monti, Karen McGregor, Gail Whitehouse, Lynne Trenholme, Natalie Pearman, Julie Finlay, Vicky Glass, Tracy Wylde, Emma Caldwell. The list goes on and on. Women, often in the grip of drug addiction, who sell their bodies and die at the hands of strangers. In the past 20 years scores of prostitutes have been murdered in Britain and hundreds have been beaten, robbed or raped. Most of these cases remain unsolved. The victims often have the same sad biographies, marked by drug addiction, which lead them to sell their bodies to fund their habit. Every now and again - the Yorkshire Ripper, who killed 13 women, most of them prostitutes; and the Ipswich murders - their deaths make the headlines. But more often than not these killings fail to register with the general public. In 1996 a nationwide police project, Operation Enigma, identified 210 unsolved murders of women - many of them prostitutes - which had happened in the previous decade. . . . "It takes a heck of a long time, but we have got DNA now, which is a huge weapon, and I'm very confident that some of these cases will be detected and hopefully the Carol Clark case may be solved in the not too distant future." . . .
2. Deliberate disregard for underclass groups. The demented and psychically crippled human beings seek to deliberately disregard those in social underclasses for the purposes of victimisation. Then there are those who also seek to create such people by fabricated allegations and false negative characterisations. These are the most dangerous psychic cripples who must be identified and not allowed to act out their vicious violence in the community before it becomes too late. They invert the normal standards of society by being allowed to act out their violence.
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: 'Easy targets' for predators" by Chris Summers. This is an outstanding article and should be discussed thoroughly on air and in reports.
Date: Saturday 23 February 2008 15:00
From: Gary D Chance
To: news24@bbc.co.uk
There's a psychology of deliberate disregard working against prostitutes relegating them to an underclass that works in the same was as racial discrimination and its hatred resulting in "Strange Fruit" in the US South along with the perverted human need to dehumanise and commit violence against a person or group of people who are disliked or despised for some reason.
"Cleaning" the world of riff raff is one such expression of that attitude in an attempt to justify violence. Child abuse revenge is another possible explanation in some situations. Repression that condemns those who use prostitutes because of their inability to sustain a meaningful relationship reflects a self loathing and hatred that is projected upon prostitutes which might fit the motive for Steve Wright's murders.
Prostitution is discriminated against against as a class of people in law in much the same way that Nazi Germany discriminated against the Jews in law forbidding them work and other normal social activities. It's a totally unfounded discrimination which should be removed to legalise sex workers and ensure that they are licensed and all are protected.
The human animal has a need to abuse in many instances as a result of having been abused. Unless there is some mechanism in society which allows maturation in a healthy way to ensure that the disturbed personality is not allowed to act out violence in some way, these kinds of killings and/or violent abuse will continue on an unacceptable scale.
The great tragedy and the great problem in this society are the situations where such abuse is allowed to flourish sanctioned and supported by the state. This is where the real problem exists.
When violence and murder can be carried out under the legitimate guise of dehumanisation including vigilante behaviour where "s/he deserves it" or "s/he asked for it" becomes an acceptable justification, the society has lost any fundamental sense of values and a foundation in law that is requisite for any decency reflected by values and standards.
Such is the problem in the UK which creates these terrible murders where everyone is shocked. They should not be if they look closely at their daily lives and see where they have witnessed and even participated in the "little murders" that lead to the big ones.
3. Child's remains 'found' in Jersey. The remains of a child have been found at a former care home in Jersey, and the search continues for others. It has not been established that this was a homicide as yet, but it is most likely that the remains date from before 1986. At least three decades of child abuse ending with the closure of this home in he 1980s did not come to light officially until recently when abused children now grown old have described their abuse after attention was focused on this institution following investigation at another.
BBC News Saturday, 23 February 2008, 17:13 GMT
Child's remains 'found' in Jersey
 Haut de la Garenne is now a Jersey youth hostel |
Police have confirmed that they have discovered parts of a child's body at a former care home in Jersey and believe they may uncover more bodies.
The remains are believed to date from the early 1980s and were discovered at the site at Haut de la Garenne.
A specialist team is continuing its search of the building which is at the centre of an investigation into alleged child abuse over a period of 40 years.
The search of the site began on Tuesday using a sniffer dog and ground radar.
BBC News reporter Rachel Foley said Jersey's Deputy Chief Officer, Lenny Harper, the senior investigating officer, told a press conference on the island that detectives "think there is the possibility they may find more remains".
The investigation involves the abuse of boys and girls aged between 11 and 15 at several government institutions and organisations in Jersey.
Jersey Police began investigating allegations of abuse in November last year.
Haute de la Garenne and Jersey Sea Cadets are the main focus of the inquiry.
Child's remains 'found' in Jersey
4. Little difference between Jersey and North Kensington. As far as violent abuse against children and, in my situation, an adult, there is no difference between the government on the isle of Jersey and that of the Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea. The child abuse went on for decades on Jersey, and in my direct experience the child abuse and my own abuse at hands of the child abusers and their supporters has gone on for a decade.
It's amazing what child abusers get away with and what they do to children and others to enable them to carry on as violent abusers supported by the police, NHS, social services and local and central government as I briefly note below once again. I reported child abuse in the flat below mine on 5th May 1998 almost a decade ago.
Since that time I've been subjected to extreme abuse 24/7 by these people who also got the use of then operational control over surveillance technology from mid-August 1998 onwards. The Royal Borough, its tenant management organisations, the police, social services, NHS, et al really know how to cover up child abuse so that it can go on along with the same abuse carried out against the adult who reported it. No wonder no one reports child abuse or anything else for that matter.
These people continue to operate with impunity and full support for their extreme abuse against me as I write this.
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: "Child's remains 'found' in Jersey" Decades of child abuse resulting in the death of children should liminot surprise anyone. Why is it that these problems still go on unaddressed despite being extensively reported?
Date: Saturday 23 February 2008 15:21
From: Gary D Chance
To: news24@bbc.co.uk
For some four decades child abuse was carried out on Jersey which is now finally under investigation. Is it any surprise that the remains of a child have been found?
I've been using this as an example of how such violent abuse is carried out in this country for decades without its ever surfacing to the point where the police actually conduct a meaningful investigation.
I've been reporting similar institutionalised violence against me for a decade by the use of surveillance technology which has all the characteristics of child abuse that is allowed to continue.
The police, the NHS, social services and the government at local and central levels are participants in this abuse and have condoned and sustained it for 9.5 years 24/7. Hundreds of people have participated.
The victim is blamed. No one listens to the victim. The victim is defenceless in my case made so by surveillance technology. Its a classic case of institutionalised violence that is hidden by various means enabling it to go on now for a decade.
If an adult cannot report exactly what is happening for a decade to a wide range of recipients including the media especially the BBC and expose the truth of abuse, children do not have a prayer of addressing the violence carried out against them.
They wind up dead as we all learn from time to time by examples just asJessica Randall recently and Victoria Climbie in early 2000. Adults wind updead too.
How can you continue to report these abuses which have gone on for decades and not report similar abuse on an institutional level carried out against an adult near the BBC when you've been informed about this continuously for many years?
Never ask why these problems of abuse go on for decades without being stopped. You should know exactly why this happens by examining your own actions.
5. Mandatory DNA database rejected. I find this unbelievable that this government will not create the means to establish such a database to be able to address crimes of all kinds present and past. At the same time the government continues with an ID card scheme that will be the most expensive fiasco ever known. At least a DNA database will enable every person to be identified. And ID card database will contain wide ranging information and be subject to extreme abuse from lost/stolen records while not solving crimes.
BBC News Saturday, 23 February 2008, 10:06 GMT
Mandatory DNA database rejected
![Mark Dixie [South London Guardian] and Steve Wright](http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44446000/jpg/_44446215_composite.jpg) Both killers were convicted with compelling DNA evidence |
Calls to put the DNA of every UK resident on a national database are impractical, the government has said.
Senior police officers have argued for a universal register after two killers were convicted on DNA evidence.
Suffolk serial murderer Steve Wright and Sally Anne Bowman's killer, Mark Dixie, were both captured because their DNA was taken after unrelated offences.
The Home Office said a mandatory database "would raise significant practical and ethical issues".
The DNA database, which covers England and Wales, currently contains around 4.5m profiles - routinely taken from criminal suspects after most arrests.
It is already the largest of its kind in the world.
Mandatory DNA database rejected
6. Let's have a DNA database for all now. Let's be able to solve these crimes described above along with most others with a universal DNA database. This is something which will protect by enabling identification of criminals. I have yet to see anyone actually describe the process of abuse to which such DNA from a database can be put. I see a multitude of benefit and little if any problems. Just what are the problems if they exist?
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: "Mandatory DNA database rejected" The Home Office cannot do anything right. Date: Saturday 23 February 2008 11:11
From: Gary D Chance
To: news24@bbc.co.uk
A mandatory national DNA database for everyone makes all the sense in the world. This would go a long way to solving every crime and would be a great deterrence.
Where's the potential abuse? Would someone please be specific? Other than planting someone's DNA I cannot see how such a database could be abused.
When planting DNA at say the scene of a crime, this would be obvious since it would not have its wide spread presence and would appear to be planted rather than as part of human criminal activity.
Even if someone tried to substitute DNA for their own to remain hidden, it would be easy to detect. No one can escape the reality of one's own DNA
.Dead bodies could be identified easily and quickly or missing people who turn up from time to time not knowing who they are.
A DNA database is far preferable to a national ID card system where the data can be lost or stolen and misused significantly
I believe that policy decisions are taken for control purposes and to keep everyone employed.
If you actually solve crime and create a significant deterrence, this would mean that law enforcement and the Home Office bureaucracy could be reduced or meaningfully redirected to significant threats.
Those in positions of power do not want that diminished, and in a fundamental sense want to perpetuate problems so that they can always be kept busy.
There is a disposition toward control rather than solution of problems. and this is the way the Home Office has been moving for the past decade.
The benefits from a national DNA database are extraordinary and its risks are insignificant to nonexistent.
Let's get on with it, please.