The Times Thursday 25th May 2006

Sex-for-visas chief stayed on illegally

By Richard Ford

JOHN REID is facing more embarrassment over the sex-for-visas scandal, only three weeks into his position as Home Secretary.

Yesterday it was disclosed that James Dawute, 53, the chief immigration officer who allegedly offered to speed up a Zimbabwean teenager’s asylum claim in return for sexual favours, was given British citizenship despite being an illegal overstayer.

Mr Dawute, who has been suspended from his job at Lunar House, in Croydon, arrived legally in the 1980s as a visitor but overstayed the terms of his entry into the country. He was later given British citizenship.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,17129-2196390,00.html

The very intense destructive abuse from surveillance technology continues as usual as of this writing.  Every effort is being made by those who are carrying it out to destroy and cover up the reality of what is happening.  This is getting support all the way to the top to prevent the devastating impact from the revelation of what has been done to me 24/7 for almost eight years.  Everyone has a vested interest in this cover up.  It's disclosure would topple this Labour Government.

It runs agaisnt the very foundation of a civilised society and everything for which it stands that anyone should be allowed to continue to use surveillance  technology on a lengthy and indefinite basis in order to fabricate allegations and negative characterisations while attempting to create a problems which do not exist to support these fabrications.  The whole point of using surveillance technology is to gain valid, objective information which enables society to function better as a result of stopping activities which are detrimental to it.  When this standard is inverted,  and the state allows criminals to use surveillance technology in order to pervert the course of justice by attacking the person who reported the criminal activity in the first place, then the society ceases to function as a society at the moment this abuse commences. 

It is the responsibility of a legitimate society to investigate such abuses completely to bring to light all that has happened in order to reassure the general public that legitmacy is the standard.  Failing to do so means that the government is illegitimate.  This is why a cover up by those in authority is viewed as the most serious of offenses for they are not discharging their obligations and responsibilities which are provided to them by the general public for the purpose of the administering human affairs and society.   Most critical is the responsibility and obligation of the individual to not participate in such abuse and to report it.  This is the cornerstone of democracy: the individual's responsibility and obligation to recognise and maintain agreed upon fundamental standards.  To the degree that such individual compliance and behaviour does not exist is the degree to which democracy does not exist.

The use of surveillance technology is a most special privilege which requires great care and management excellence for it is the means by which the most serious abuses take place which can and will destroy society if allowed to go unchecked, unreported and undisclosed.  This is what has been happening in my direct experience 24/7 for almost eight years.   Such activity is completely unacceptable, unconscionable in the most extreme sense and destroys the very foundation of this society.  Hiding behind surveillance technology to perpetuate the most serious of crimes is just another reflection of the "hooded" criminal remaining hidden behnd surveillance technology while carrying out continuous criminal activity.  

The very thought of the ability to carry out continuous criminal activity 24/7 while hiding behind surveillance technology and its protection is so horrendous as to be beyond anyone's imagination.  This is why many would prefer to deny reality rather than confront it.  This is why the abuse of surveillance technology must be considered the most serious of crimes and treated accordingly under the law by those who are responsible for its proper use.  When the corruption reaches such an extent that those responsible for the proper use of surveillance technology become its abusers, society has then lost its way. 

There are some things which cannot under any circumstances be done.  These are reflected in the European Human Rights Act of 1998 adopted in the UK in October 2000.  Abuse of surveillance technology such as I've been directly experiencing all these years wipes out all human and civil rights.   Those charged with law enforcement who carry out this activity against me or allow it to be carried out are not engaged in law enforcement at all.  They are vigilantes who take the law into their own hands for their own personal, corrupt self interest with grave consequences for society which we've already seen in the terrorist bombings July 2005.  The impact of such abuse is widespread and not as visible as the terrorist bombings, but they go on nonetheless.